The Effects of Numerical Evidence and Message Framing in Communicating Vaccine Efficacy

To examine the effects of numerical evidence and message framing in communicating vaccine efficacy information about infectious diseases, an online experiment presented to U.S. adults different versions of a vaccination promotional message that vary by numerical vaccine efficacy evidence: (low efficacy rate: 60% vs. high efficacy rate: 95%), outcome framing (preventing disease-related infection vs. preventing disease-related severe illness), and gain vs. loss framing, using a factorial between-subjects design. While there was no significant interaction between numerical vaccine efficacy evidence and message framing, findings showed that a higher vaccine efficacy rate increased positive beliefs about vaccination and outcome framing emphasizing infection prevention increased message processing fluency. Given that infectious diseases pose higher risks for severe illness among older adults, follow-up analyses by age showed that only younger adults were sensitive to message framing where outcome framing emphasizing infection prevention increased processing fluency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2409819
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Numerical Evidence and Message Framing in Communicating Vaccine Efficacy

Sang Jung Kim, Linqi Lu, Jiawei Liu, Ran Tao et al.
1 citations
Journal of Health Communication
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
0.53
article

The Effects of Numerical Evidence and Message Framing in Communicating Vaccine Efficacy

Sang Jung Kim, Linqi Lu, Jiawei Liu, Ran Tao, Dhavan V. Shah, Douglas M. McLeod
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To examine the effects of numerical evidence and message framing in communicating vaccine efficacy information about infectious diseases, an online experiment presented to U.S. adults different versions of a vaccination promotional message that vary by numerical vaccine efficacy evidence: (low efficacy rate: 60% vs. high efficacy rate: 95%), outcome framing (preventing disease-related infection vs. preventing disease-related severe illness), and gain vs. loss framing, using a factorial between-subjects design. While there was no significant interaction between numerical vaccine efficacy evidence and message framing, findings showed that a higher vaccine efficacy rate increased positive beliefs about vaccination and outcome framing emphasizing infection prevention increased message processing fluency. Given that infectious diseases pose higher risks for severe illness among older adults, follow-up analyses by age showed that only younger adults were sensitive to message framing where outcome framing emphasizing infection prevention increased processing fluency.

Journal of Health CommunicationVol. 29(10)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Iowa (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Florida (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effects of Numerical Evidence and Message Framing in Communicating Vaccine Efficacy — Sang Jung Kim, Linqi Lu, et al. · Journal of Health Communication (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS