How do various encapsulation techniques improve the oral delivery of food protein hydrolysates?

Abstract The development of bioformulations based on food protein hydrolysates (FPHs) has gained significant traction in the food and pharmaceutical sectors due to their biophysical and biochemical properties, including health‐promoting effects, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. However, the oral delivery of FPHs presents notable technical challenges, largely due to their inherent limitations such as (bio)stability, permeability, bioavailability, and molecular size. This review provides a comprehensive overview of FPHs, including their structural characteristics, origins, methods of preparation, and associated health benefits. Additionally, it highlights the challenges related to their oral delivery. Recent advancements in the formulation and delivery of FPHs through biopolymeric controlled release systems—such as micro‐ and nanoparticles, hydrogels, biofunctional films and composites, and electrospun fibers—are discussed. We also explore lipid‐based delivery platforms, including liposomes, chitosomes, emulsions, Pickering emulsions, nanostructured lipid carriers, solid lipid nanoparticles, and surfactant‐based carriers. Furthermore, this article emphasizes the importance of controlled delivery and targeted release of FPHs following oral administration. The challenges in designing effective lipid/biopolymer‐based carriers for FPHs, along with future prospects and opportunities in this growing field, are also thoroughly examined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Frontiers
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.492
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Proteins in Food Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do various encapsulation techniques improve the oral delivery of food protein hydrolysates?

Merve Tomaş, Alicja Barańska, Basheer Aaliya, Katarzyna Samborska et al.
11 citations
Food Frontiers
Proteins in Food Systems
3.83
article

How do various encapsulation techniques improve the oral delivery of food protein hydrolysates?

Merve Tomaş, Alicja Barańska, Basheer Aaliya, Katarzyna Samborska, Esra Çapanoğlu, Hadis Rostamabadi, Kappat Valiyapeediyekkal Sunooj, Seid Reza Falsafi, Monica Trif, Sneh Puniabangar
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract The development of bioformulations based on food protein hydrolysates (FPHs) has gained significant traction in the food and pharmaceutical sectors due to their biophysical and biochemical properties, including health‐promoting effects, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. However, the oral delivery of FPHs presents notable technical challenges, largely due to their inherent limitations such as (bio)stability, permeability, bioavailability, and molecular size. This review provides a comprehensive overview of FPHs, including their structural characteristics, origins, methods of preparation, and associated health benefits. Additionally, it highlights the challenges related to their oral delivery. Recent advancements in the formulation and delivery of FPHs through biopolymeric controlled release systems—such as micro‐ and nanoparticles, hydrogels, biofunctional films and composites, and electrospun fibers—are discussed. We also explore lipid‐based delivery platforms, including liposomes, chitosomes, emulsions, Pickering emulsions, nanostructured lipid carriers, solid lipid nanoparticles, and surfactant‐based carriers. Furthermore, this article emphasizes the importance of controlled delivery and targeted release of FPHs following oral administration. The challenges in designing effective lipid/biopolymer‐based carriers for FPHs, along with future prospects and opportunities in this growing field, are also thoroughly examined.

Food FrontiersVol. 6(1)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR), İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi (TR), Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL), Pondicherry University (IN), Centre for innovative process engineering (DE), Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research (IR), Agricultural Research & Education Organization (IR), Istanbul Technical University (TR), Clemson University (US)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Proteins in Food Systems
3.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.