The technopolitics of border security R&D: Shaping the EU’s border in the Security Research Programme
Abstract Technologies are predominantly understood as ‘solutions’ for policy problems in EU border control. This has prompted increased political attention to research and development (R&D) of ‘innovative’ security technologies. The European Commission has continuously increased its spending on the development of security devices in the Security Research Programme; at the same time, border security institutions such as Frontex or eu-LISA have worked to amplify their influence on shaping security research in the EU’s Research Framework Programmes. Against this backdrop, this article develops the argument that R&D is a political practice of ‘making’ and governing the border through its entanglement with the politics of border security in the EU. By conceptualizing R&D as ‘borderwork’, the article interrogates how practices of security R&D inscribes specific logics into EU border security and control. In doing this, it also problematizes how R&D locks in exclusionary dichotomies and categorizations of mobilities through privileging security actors in the process. Based on qualitative interviews, the article provides an in-depth analysis of political processes through which R&D programmes and projects materialize at policymaking, implementing and operational levels. Through this, the article explores comprehensively how political logics of bordering are constantly shaping and simultaneously renegotiated in R&D.
Authors
- Clemens Binder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9842-0139)
Institutions
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Security Dialogue
- Published
- 2024-10-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106241269795
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Global Security and Public Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.66