The politics of journal content: Breadth, depth, flexibility and reflexivity in 25 years of <i>BJPIR</i>

This article reflects on the past, present and future of the BJPIR through a content analysis of all 999 articles that have been published in the journal between its launch in April 1999 and the latest issue in May 2024. By charting ‘core’, ‘secondary’ and ‘peripheral’ pools of scholarship, this reveals a politics of journal content which, in turn, can be used to raise critical questions concerning shifting intellectual boundaries and a changing socio-political context. More specifically, the results of the content analysis focus attention on the twin-themes of flexibility and reflexivity in journal publishing. The central argument emerging from this analysis is that if the BJPIR is to continue along its highly successful trajectory, then it may well need to embrace greater flexibility in terms of reaching beyond political science and international relations, while engaging with greater reflexivity as to societal linkage and relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481241284375
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of journal content: Breadth, depth, flexibility and reflexivity in 25 years of BJPIR

Matthew Flinders
1 citations
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Academic Freedom and Politics
2.23
article

The politics of journal content: Breadth, depth, flexibility and reflexivity in 25 years of BJPIR

Matthew Flinders
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article reflects on the past, present and future of the BJPIR through a content analysis of all 999 articles that have been published in the journal between its launch in April 1999 and the latest issue in May 2024. By charting ‘core’, ‘secondary’ and ‘peripheral’ pools of scholarship, this reveals a politics of journal content which, in turn, can be used to raise critical questions concerning shifting intellectual boundaries and a changing socio-political context. More specifically, the results of the content analysis focus attention on the twin-themes of flexibility and reflexivity in journal publishing. The central argument emerging from this analysis is that if the BJPIR is to continue along its highly successful trajectory, then it may well need to embrace greater flexibility in terms of reaching beyond political science and international relations, while engaging with greater reflexivity as to societal linkage and relevance.

The British Journal of Politics and International RelationsVol. 27(2)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Academic Freedom and Politics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The politics of journal content: Breadth, depth, flexibility and reflexivity in 25 years of <i>BJPIR</i> — Matthew Flinders · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS