OBJECTION! USE OF A.I.!

Generative artificial intelligence (A.I.), most prominently ChatGPT, has generated massive amounts of hype around the world, including in litigation. The use of this technology, while possibly beneficial in certain regards, also poses significant risks: misinformation and made-up information, breaches of legal professional privilege, data collection and retention, damage to judicial integrity, and concerns about ethics. This paper set out to (1) review the risks that the use of generative A.I. poses in litigation, and (2) suggest regulations to address said risks. The findings showed that generative A.I., in its current form, should be prohibited altogether in litigation. Its use in the future, if allowed to be used, should be strictly regulated. Whether generative A.I. should be involved in litigation at all remains an open societal question which urgently demands consideration. Keywords: generative artificial intelligence, litigation, regulation, ChatGPT, literature review

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Maastricht Journal of Liberal Arts
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26481/mjla.2024.v15.981
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OBJECTION! USE OF A.I.!

Sybren Wolfs
The Maastricht Journal of Liberal Arts
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

OBJECTION! USE OF A.I.!

Sybren Wolfs
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (A.I.), most prominently ChatGPT, has generated massive amounts of hype around the world, including in litigation. The use of this technology, while possibly beneficial in certain regards, also poses significant risks: misinformation and made-up information, breaches of legal professional privilege, data collection and retention, damage to judicial integrity, and concerns about ethics. This paper set out to (1) review the risks that the use of generative A.I. poses in litigation, and (2) suggest regulations to address said risks. The findings showed that generative A.I., in its current form, should be prohibited altogether in litigation. Its use in the future, if allowed to be used, should be strictly regulated. Whether generative A.I. should be involved in litigation at all remains an open societal question which urgently demands consideration. Keywords: generative artificial intelligence, litigation, regulation, ChatGPT, literature review

The Maastricht Journal of Liberal ArtsVol. 15
Usibelli Coal Mine (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.