Study on Misoprostol in Case of Missed Abortion

Background: Misoprostol and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) are both effective treatments for incomplete abortion. Misoprostol, a medication that induces uterine contractions, is often preferred for its non-invasive nature and ease of administration. MVA, a surgical method, involves removing retained products of conception using suction. Studies suggest that while MVA has a higher success rate and faster recovery, misoprostol is a cost-effective, accessible option with fewer complications, though it may require follow-up treatment in some cases. Objective: In this our main goal is to assess the efficiency of misoprostol versus manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of incomplete abortion. Method: This hospital based randomized controlled trial study was conducted in in-patient patient Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chittagong Medical College and Hospital from October 2007 to September 2008. A total of 128 women between the age of 15 to 40 years with diagnosis of first trimester uncomplicated spontaneous incomplete abortion was included in this study. Among them 64 patients were randomized in group ‘A’ as case who were treated with Misoprostol and 64 patients were in group ‘B’ as control who were treated with Manual Vacuum Aspiration. Results: During the study, where the mean gestational size of uterus was 9.52 weeks at the time of initial examination. The mean size of uterus in misoprostol group was 9.07(SD ±1.93) and that of MVA group was 9.87 (SD± 1.35). More women in case group had no child of viable age on the other hand increased number of women in control group had at least one viable birth. 36 (60%) out of 60 women in misoprostol group 26 (41.93%) out of 62 reported pain and 36 (58.07%) out of 62 women in MVA and 24 (40%) patients in misoprostol arm said bleeding as the worst feature. Thirty six percent women in misoprostol group and 16% women in MVA group reported that the adverse effects were easily tolerable. Thirty percent women ...