Comparative Analysis of Hardware Performance for Linear Detection in a Massive MIMO System on FPGA Using the Vivado HLS Tool

This paper compares the performance of hardware implementation for linear detection in a massive MIMO system. The study focuses on Gram matrix inversion solved using two approaches: direct and indirect matrix inversion. Direct matrix inversion is represented by Cholesky Decomposition, while indirect matrix inversion is represented by the Neumann series and the Gauss-Seidel method. The algorithm for inversions, embedded in a C-based function, is virtually implemented on the FPGA using the Vivado HLS tool. The synthesis report categorizes the performance from the FPGA implementation into three parts: timing (ns), cycle latency, and resource utilization. With the same targeted time limit, indirect matrix inversion such as the Neumann series seems to be the fastest algorithm compared to the direct method due to the matrix-matrix multiplication approach. In terms of latency, NS requires more clock cycles to obtain the output compared to others. Based on the results, the direct inversion method exhibits higher complexity, particularly in timing for clock frequency and resource utilization needed to complete the inversion

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52549/ijeei.v12i3.5356
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Hardware Performance for Linear Detection in a Massive MIMO System on FPGA Using the Vivado HLS Tool

Nurulhuda Ismail, Mohamad Hairol Jabbar, Ariffuddin Joret, Norshidah Katiran et al.
1 citations
Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)
Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
0.21
article

Comparative Analysis of Hardware Performance for Linear Detection in a Massive MIMO System on FPGA Using the Vivado HLS Tool

Nurulhuda Ismail, Mohamad Hairol Jabbar, Ariffuddin Joret, Norshidah Katiran, Eddy Irwan Shah Saadon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper compares the performance of hardware implementation for linear detection in a massive MIMO system. The study focuses on Gram matrix inversion solved using two approaches: direct and indirect matrix inversion. Direct matrix inversion is represented by Cholesky Decomposition, while indirect matrix inversion is represented by the Neumann series and the Gauss-Seidel method. The algorithm for inversions, embedded in a C-based function, is virtually implemented on the FPGA using the Vivado HLS tool. The synthesis report categorizes the performance from the FPGA implementation into three parts: timing (ns), cycle latency, and resource utilization. With the same targeted time limit, indirect matrix inversion such as the Neumann series seems to be the fastest algorithm compared to the direct method due to the matrix-matrix multiplication approach. In terms of latency, NS requires more clock cycles to obtain the output compared to others. Based on the results, the direct inversion method exhibits higher complexity, particularly in timing for clock frequency and resource utilization needed to complete the inversion

Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)Vol. 12(3)
Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia (MY)
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.