Current Ear and Hearing Care Practices for Infants and Toddlers with Cleft Palate in the United States

ObjectiveTo examine ear and hearing clinical practices across American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams in the United States.DesignMulti-site prospective, observational, longitudinal study.SettingSeventeen Cleft Palate Teams in the United States.Patients, ParticipantsChildren with cleft palate, with or without cleft lip (CP ± L), born between 2015 and 2022, evaluated by 18 months (n = 1246).InterventionsNone.Main Outcome Measure(s)Standard of care otolaryngology and audiology appointments evaluated in the context of whether otolaryngology and audiology services were provided as embedded care within the team visit or as ancillary services.ResultsOver 71% of infants passed newborn hearing screening (NBHS). By age 18 months, only 40% of infants received audiologic follow-up while 93.6% of children received otolaryngology care. Follow-up was significantly better for infants served by teams with embedded providers versus those who refer families for ancillary services; the odds of seeing an audiologist by 18 months were three times as high among participants seen by teams with embedded audiology (OR = 3.25; CI = 2.0, 5.2) while those seen by teams with embedded otolaryngologists had more than double the odds of seeing an otolaryngologist by 18 months (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.5, 3.2).ConclusionsThere is considerable variability across ACPA-approved centers in the US regarding the timing and completion of otolaryngology and audiologic follow-up for children with CP ± L. This study highlights the importance of following established standards of care and the impact that team composition and access to clinical services can have on equity of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241283535
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Ear and Hearing Care Practices for Infants and Toddlers with Cleft Palate in the United States

Deborah S. F. Kacmarynski, Jonathan Grischkan, Greg Allen, Adriane L. Baylis et al.
2 citations
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
1.10
article

Current Ear and Hearing Care Practices for Infants and Toddlers with Cleft Palate in the United States

Deborah S. F. Kacmarynski, Jonathan Grischkan, Greg Allen, Adriane L. Baylis, Ursula M. Findlen, Emily C. Nightengale, Sarah Hatch Pollard, Anna Meehan, Lauren C. Alexander
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine ear and hearing clinical practices across American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams in the United States.DesignMulti-site prospective, observational, longitudinal study.SettingSeventeen Cleft Palate Teams in the United States.Patients, ParticipantsChildren with cleft palate, with or without cleft lip (CP ± L), born between 2015 and 2022, evaluated by 18 months (n = 1246).InterventionsNone.Main Outcome Measure(s)Standard of care otolaryngology and audiology appointments evaluated in the context of whether otolaryngology and audiology services were provided as embedded care within the team visit or as ancillary services.ResultsOver 71% of infants passed newborn hearing screening (NBHS). By age 18 months, only 40% of infants received audiologic follow-up while 93.6% of children received otolaryngology care. Follow-up was significantly better for infants served by teams with embedded providers versus those who refer families for ancillary services; the odds of seeing an audiologist by 18 months were three times as high among participants seen by teams with embedded audiology (OR = 3.25; CI = 2.0, 5.2) while those seen by teams with embedded otolaryngologists had more than double the odds of seeing an otolaryngologist by 18 months (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.5, 3.2).ConclusionsThere is considerable variability across ACPA-approved centers in the US regarding the timing and completion of otolaryngology and audiologic follow-up for children with CP ± L. This study highlights the importance of following established standards of care and the impact that team composition and access to clinical services can have on equity of care.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial JournalVol. 62(11)
University of Iowa (US), Seattle Children's Hospital (US), Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), University of Utah (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
1.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.