Are Suicide-Specific Interventions Required to Reduce Suicidal Ideation? An Empirical Examination in a Clinical Sample of Eating-Disorder Participants

This research examined whether non-suicide-specific treatments effectively reduced suicidal ideation (SI) among a clinical sample of eating disorder (ED) patients (<i>N</i>=3,447 of whom 50.9% presented with SI). All participants met criteria for a current <i>DSM-5</i> ED and were administered a combination of evidence-based treatments in inpatient, residential, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient ED treatment facilities. Mediation analyses tested whether SI at discharge decreased specifically through standardized residual change scores in ED symptoms. Both SI and ED symptoms decreased over the course of treatment without clinically meaningful differences by ED diagnosis. ED symptom improvement partially mediated the relationship between SI at admission and discharge, suggesting that treating ED symptoms with evidence-based treatments can be an effective way to reduce SI, at least partially, for many patients. These findings demonstrate the importance of facilitating evidence-based treatment referrals for specific disorders as a component of broad-based suicide outreach and prevention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241274746
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Suicide-Specific Interventions Required to Reduce Suicidal Ideation? An Empirical Examination in a Clinical Sample of Eating-Disorder Participants

Megan Riddle, Dan V. Blalock, Philip S. Mehler, Jamie Manwaring et al.
2 citations
Clinical Psychological Science
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
1.28
article

Are Suicide-Specific Interventions Required to Reduce Suicidal Ideation? An Empirical Examination in a Clinical Sample of Eating-Disorder Participants

Megan Riddle, Dan V. Blalock, Philip S. Mehler, Jamie Manwaring, Tyler B. Rice, Morgan Robison, Renee D. Rienecke, Susan McClanahan, Thomas E. Joiner, Alan Duffy, Daniel Le Grange, Mina Velimirović
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research examined whether non-suicide-specific treatments effectively reduced suicidal ideation (SI) among a clinical sample of eating disorder (ED) patients (<i>N</i>=3,447 of whom 50.9% presented with SI). All participants met criteria for a current <i>DSM-5</i> ED and were administered a combination of evidence-based treatments in inpatient, residential, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient ED treatment facilities. Mediation analyses tested whether SI at discharge decreased specifically through standardized residual change scores in ED symptoms. Both SI and ED symptoms decreased over the course of treatment without clinically meaningful differences by ED diagnosis. ED symptom improvement partially mediated the relationship between SI at admission and discharge, suggesting that treating ED symptoms with evidence-based treatments can be an effective way to reduce SI, at least partially, for many patients. These findings demonstrate the importance of facilitating evidence-based treatment referrals for specific disorders as a component of broad-based suicide outreach and prevention strategies.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 13(3)
Florida State University (US), University of Novi Sad (RS), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), Denver Health Medical Center (US), University of Chicago (US), Pathlight (US), Durham VA Medical Center (US), Center for Anxiety and Depression (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, National Institute of Mental Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.