Design optimization of automotive carbon fiber composite material floor laminate based on PSO-BFO algorithm

In response to the current challenges of low precision and efficiency in the optimization of composite material layups, the insufficient lightweight of automotive body floors, and the high cost of carbon fiber composites, this study introduces an optimized design method for carbon fiber composite flooring layups. Based on implicit parametric technology, a hybrid PSO-BFO (Particle Swarm Optimization-Bacterial Foraging Optimization) algorithm is employed. This approach achieves an integrated optimization of materials, processes, and structures, thereby balancing and reducing costs. The SFE-CONCEPT is utilized to establish an implicit parameterization model for the body floor, which is validated through experiments and finite element simulation analysis. Concept design and modeling of the carbon fiber composite material floor laminate are performed. Continuous variable optimization is employed to determine the thickness, tile shape, and number of layers for the front, middle, and rear floors. A continuous variable discretization rounding strategy is used to obtain the discrete layer numbers for each laminate orientation of the composite material floor. The continuous fiber lamination strategy is applied to create different shared lamination regions. The PSO-BFO hybrid optimization method is proposed to optimize the lamination sequence as a multi-objective optimization, addressing the challenges of discrete lamination sequence, explosive combinations, and multiple variables in the optimization design of carbon fiber composite material floor laminates. The optimization results demonstrate improvements of 34.4% in floor quality M, 6.0% in static bending stiffness BS, and 5.3% in lightweight coefficient QLX using the proposed PSO-BFO method. PSO-BFO and PSO-GA (Particle Swarm Optimization-Genetic Algorithm) methods are more capable of obtaining global optimal solutions for complex optimization problems than single optimization algorithms. Still, the results obtained by the PSO-BFO method are more balanced.