Turkish Adaptation of the Digital Literacy Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Objective: This study sets out to examine the reliability and validity of the Digital Literacy Scale’s Turkish version. Methods: The study employed a methodological, cross-sectional, and descriptive design. The study sample consisted of students and academic and administrative staff at a state university, and 302 people participated. Personal information form, the Digital Literacy Scale by Reddy et al (2023), and the Digital Literacy Scale by Bayrakcı and Narmanlıoğlu (2021) were employed to gather data. Language validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability analyses were carried out to assess the validity and reliability of the scale. Results: The Digital Literacy Scale’s Cronbach’s alpha was 0.978. For test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient varied between 0.879 and 0.918, which was significant for the scale. Factor analysis revealed a 6-factor structure. A strong and significant correlation between the scales was found using the parallel form reliability method (r=0.734, P < .001). Conclusion: It was found that the Digital Literacy Scale’s Turkish version is a valid and reliable tool for determining digital literacy. Cite this article as: Yıldırım S, Özdemir L, Uslu Şahan F, Bora Güneş N, Yücel Özçırpan Ç, Mert Karadaş M. Turkish adaptation of the digital literacy scale: A validity and reliability study. Arch Health Sci Res. 2024;11(3):203-209.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Health Science and Research
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/archealthscires.2024.24067
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turkish Adaptation of the Digital Literacy Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Çiğdem Yücel, Fatma Uslu-Şahan, Nebahat Bora Güneş, Merve Mert-Karadas et al.
Archives of Health Science and Research
Digital literacy in education
article

Turkish Adaptation of the Digital Literacy Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Çiğdem Yücel, Fatma Uslu-Şahan, Nebahat Bora Güneş, Merve Mert-Karadas, Sevda Yıldırım, Leyla Özdemir
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study sets out to examine the reliability and validity of the Digital Literacy Scale’s Turkish version. Methods: The study employed a methodological, cross-sectional, and descriptive design. The study sample consisted of students and academic and administrative staff at a state university, and 302 people participated. Personal information form, the Digital Literacy Scale by Reddy et al (2023), and the Digital Literacy Scale by Bayrakcı and Narmanlıoğlu (2021) were employed to gather data. Language validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability analyses were carried out to assess the validity and reliability of the scale. Results: The Digital Literacy Scale’s Cronbach’s alpha was 0.978. For test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient varied between 0.879 and 0.918, which was significant for the scale. Factor analysis revealed a 6-factor structure. A strong and significant correlation between the scales was found using the parallel form reliability method (r=0.734, P < .001). Conclusion: It was found that the Digital Literacy Scale’s Turkish version is a valid and reliable tool for determining digital literacy. Cite this article as: Yıldırım S, Özdemir L, Uslu Şahan F, Bora Güneş N, Yücel Özçırpan Ç, Mert Karadaş M. Turkish adaptation of the digital literacy scale: A validity and reliability study. Arch Health Sci Res. 2024;11(3):203-209.

Archives of Health Science and ResearchVol. 11(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.