Cross examination of smart urbanism and Southern urbanism: A systematic literature review in search of ‘Southern smart urbanism’

This paper systematically reviews the literature on smart urbanism and Southern urbanism to conceptualise smart cities in the Global South. Through a two-stage analysis, the paper highlights the gaps in theorising Southern smart urbanism around three areas – visioning, development, and planning; infrastructure and services; and social and community. Findings argue for the articulation of Southern smart urbanism informed by the Southern urban critique via (i) progressing the bottom-up right-based rather than top-down normative visioning, development, and planning; (ii) leapfrogging rather than retrofitting infrastructure and services; and (iii) emphasising collective society and community rather than the individual smart citizen. • Uncovers the gaps between smart urbanism and Southern urbanism literature and conceptualises ‘Southern smart urbanism’. • Progresses bottom-up right-based rather than top-down normative visioning, development and planning. • Leapfrogs rather than retrofitting infrastructure and services. • Emphasises collective society and community rather than the individual smart citizen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105459
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross examination of smart urbanism and Southern urbanism: A systematic literature review in search of ‘Southern smart urbanism’

Tooran Alizadeh, Deepti Prasad
4 citations
Cities
Smart Cities and Technologies
1.28
article

Cross examination of smart urbanism and Southern urbanism: A systematic literature review in search of ‘Southern smart urbanism’

Tooran Alizadeh, Deepti Prasad
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper systematically reviews the literature on smart urbanism and Southern urbanism to conceptualise smart cities in the Global South. Through a two-stage analysis, the paper highlights the gaps in theorising Southern smart urbanism around three areas – visioning, development, and planning; infrastructure and services; and social and community. Findings argue for the articulation of Southern smart urbanism informed by the Southern urban critique via (i) progressing the bottom-up right-based rather than top-down normative visioning, development, and planning; (ii) leapfrogging rather than retrofitting infrastructure and services; and (iii) emphasising collective society and community rather than the individual smart citizen. • Uncovers the gaps between smart urbanism and Southern urbanism literature and conceptualises ‘Southern smart urbanism’. • Progresses bottom-up right-based rather than top-down normative visioning, development and planning. • Leapfrogs rather than retrofitting infrastructure and services. • Emphasises collective society and community rather than the individual smart citizen.

CitiesVol. 155
The University of Sydney (AU)
Australian Research Council
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Smart Cities and Technologies
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.