Main Surgical Methods of Critical Tibial Bone Defects Replacement (Literature Review). Part II

Summary. This part of literature review is devoted to the main methods of critical bone defects replacement of the tibia, which cannot be repaired by using bone autoplasty. A search in the PubMed database for the period 2010 - 2023 was carried out, with preference given to the material from the last 5 years; the advantages and disadvantages of the most popular methods of treatment are shown. This article provides a descriptive, non-systematic review of the current literature on methods of tibial bone defect replacement and possible directions for future research. A thorough search in the PubMed database was performed using relevant search terms, with peer-reviewed articles in English identified and evaluated. No strict inclusion or exclusion criteria were used to select articles for a full-text review. Instead, a subjective assessment of the relevance of individual articles to the overall narrative and surgical techniques review was made, which ultimately resulted in 40 articles being referenced.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TERRA ORTHOPAEDICA
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37647/2786-7595-2024-121-2-45-53
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Main Surgical Methods of Critical Tibial Bone Defects Replacement (Literature Review). Part II

M.P. Hrytsai, V.I. Sabadosh, R.V. Vyderko, A.S. Polovyi et al.
2 citations
TERRA ORTHOPAEDICA
Bone fractures and treatments
0.77
article

Main Surgical Methods of Critical Tibial Bone Defects Replacement (Literature Review). Part II

M.P. Hrytsai, V.I. Sabadosh, R.V. Vyderko, A.S. Polovyi, V.I. Нutsailiuk, H.B. Kolov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Summary. This part of literature review is devoted to the main methods of critical bone defects replacement of the tibia, which cannot be repaired by using bone autoplasty. A search in the PubMed database for the period 2010 - 2023 was carried out, with preference given to the material from the last 5 years; the advantages and disadvantages of the most popular methods of treatment are shown. This article provides a descriptive, non-systematic review of the current literature on methods of tibial bone defect replacement and possible directions for future research. A thorough search in the PubMed database was performed using relevant search terms, with peer-reviewed articles in English identified and evaluated. No strict inclusion or exclusion criteria were used to select articles for a full-text review. Instead, a subjective assessment of the relevance of individual articles to the overall narrative and surgical techniques review was made, which ultimately resulted in 40 articles being referenced.

TERRA ORTHOPAEDICA(2(121))
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Bone fractures and treatments
0.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Main Surgical Methods of Critical Tibial Bone Defects Replacement (Literature Review). Part II — M.P. Hrytsai, V.I. Sabadosh, et al. · TERRA ORTHOPAEDICA (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS