Fully Verified Instruction Scheduling

CompCert project, the state-of-the-art compiler that achieves the first end-to-end formally verified C compiler, does not support fully verified instruction scheduling. Instead, existing research that works on such topics only implements translation validation. This means they do not have direct formal proof that the scheduling algorithm is correct, but only a posterior validation to check each compiling case. Using such a method, CompCert accepts a valid C program and compiles correctly only when the untrusted scheduler generates a correct result. However, it does not guarantee the complete correctness of the scheduler. It also causes compile-time validation overhead in the view of runtime performance. In this work, we present the first achievement in developing a mechanized library for fully verified instruction scheduling while keeping the proof workload acceptably lightweight. The idea to reduce the proof length is to exploit a simple property that the topological reordering of a topological sorted list is equal to a sequence of swapping adjacent unordered elements. Together with the transitivity of semantic simulation relation, the only burden will become proving the semantic preservation of a transition that only swaps two adjacent independent instructions inside one block. After successfully proving this result, proving the correctness of any new instruction scheduling algorithm only requires proof that it preserved the syntax-level dependence among instructions, instead of reasoning about semantics details every time. We implemented a mechanized library of such methods in the Coq proof assistant based on CompCert’s library as a framework and used the list scheduling algorithm as a case study to show the correctness can be formally proved using our theory. We show that with our method that abstracts away the semantics details, it is flexible to implement any scheduler that reorders instructions with little extra proof burden. Our scheduler in the case study also abstracts away the outside scheduling heuristic as a universal parameter so it is flexible to modify without touching any correctness proof.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3689739
Primary Topic
Logic, programming, and type systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fully Verified Instruction Scheduling

Vivek Sarkar, Jun Shirako, Ziteng Yang
1 links
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
Logic, programming, and type systems
article

Fully Verified Instruction Scheduling

Vivek Sarkar, Jun Shirako, Ziteng Yang
article en

Abstract

CompCert project, the state-of-the-art compiler that achieves the first end-to-end formally verified C compiler, does not support fully verified instruction scheduling. Instead, existing research that works on such topics only implements translation validation. This means they do not have direct formal proof that the scheduling algorithm is correct, but only a posterior validation to check each compiling case. Using such a method, CompCert accepts a valid C program and compiles correctly only when the untrusted scheduler generates a correct result. However, it does not guarantee the complete correctness of the scheduler. It also causes compile-time validation overhead in the view of runtime performance. In this work, we present the first achievement in developing a mechanized library for fully verified instruction scheduling while keeping the proof workload acceptably lightweight. The idea to reduce the proof length is to exploit a simple property that the topological reordering of a topological sorted list is equal to a sequence of swapping adjacent unordered elements. Together with the transitivity of semantic simulation relation, the only burden will become proving the semantic preservation of a transition that only swaps two adjacent independent instructions inside one block. After successfully proving this result, proving the correctness of any new instruction scheduling algorithm only requires proof that it preserved the syntax-level dependence among instructions, instead of reasoning about semantics details every time. We implemented a mechanized library of such methods in the Coq proof assistant based on CompCert’s library as a framework and used the list scheduling algorithm as a case study to show the correctness can be formally proved using our theory. We show that with our method that abstracts away the semantics details, it is flexible to implement any scheduler that reorders instructions with little extra proof burden. Our scheduler in the case study also abstracts away the outside scheduling heuristic as a universal parameter so it is flexible to modify without touching any correctness proof.

Proceedings of the ACM on Programming LanguagesVol. 8(OOPSLA2)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Logic, programming, and type systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.