Extended Reality for Public Understanding of Science: A Systematic Literature Review

The use of Extended Reality (XR) for communicating science concepts is on the rise. While most of its use is in teaching in formal contexts, its use in informal contexts has slowly gained momentum. Hence, a systematic literature review was conducted on the use of XR technologies for public understanding of science (PUS). A total of 92 empirical studies, published between 2010 and 2022, were included in the final analysis focusing on various informal learning environments such as museums, science festivals, and online platforms. The review aims to dissect the contexts and efficacy of XR technologies in fostering engagement and improving science literacy among the general public. The results indicate a prevalence of AR (Augmented Reality) approaches, and experimental studies analyzed in this review show a positive correlation between the utilization of XR over traditional approaches and improvements in engagement, knowledge retention, and understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3681716.3681734
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extended Reality for Public Understanding of Science: A Systematic Literature Review

Juho Hamari, Daniel Fernández Galeote, Nikoletta-Zampeta Legaki, Prajwal DSouza
1 links
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Extended Reality for Public Understanding of Science: A Systematic Literature Review

Juho Hamari, Daniel Fernández Galeote, Nikoletta-Zampeta Legaki, Prajwal DSouza
article en

Abstract

The use of Extended Reality (XR) for communicating science concepts is on the rise. While most of its use is in teaching in formal contexts, its use in informal contexts has slowly gained momentum. Hence, a systematic literature review was conducted on the use of XR technologies for public understanding of science (PUS). A total of 92 empirical studies, published between 2010 and 2022, were included in the final analysis focusing on various informal learning environments such as museums, science festivals, and online platforms. The review aims to dissect the contexts and efficacy of XR technologies in fostering engagement and improving science literacy among the general public. The results indicate a prevalence of AR (Augmented Reality) approaches, and experimental studies analyzed in this review show a positive correlation between the utilization of XR over traditional approaches and improvements in engagement, knowledge retention, and understanding.

Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extended Reality for Public Understanding of Science: A Systematic Literature Review — Juho Hamari, Daniel Fernández Galeote, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS