Unified Denoising Training for Recommendation

Most existing denoising recommendation methods alleviate noisy implicit feedback (user behaviors) through mainly empirical studies. However, such studies may lack theoretical explainability and fail to model comprehensive noise patterns, which hinders the understanding and capturing of different noise patterns that affect users’ behaviors. Thus, we propose to capture comprehensive noise patterns through theoretical and empirical analysis for more effective denoising, where users’ behaviors are divided into willingness and action phases to disentangle independent noise patterns. Willingness refers to the user’s intent to interact with an item, which may not lead to actual interaction due to different factors such as misclicking. Action denotes the user’s actual interaction with an item. Our analysis unveils that (1) in the willingness phase, high uncertainty in the user’s willingness to interact with the item can lead to high expectation loss which aligns with the findings of existing denoising methods; and (2) in the action phase, higher user-specific inconsistency between willingness and action not only leads to more noise in the user’s overall behaviors but also makes it harder to distinguish between true and noisy behaviors. Inspired by these findings, we propose a Unified Denoising Training (UDT) method for recommendation. To alleviate uncertainty in the willingness phase, we lower the importance of the user-item interaction with high willingness uncertainty recognized by high loss. To ease the inconsistency in the action phase, we lower the importance for users with high user-specific inconsistency as it may lead to noisier behaviors. Then, we increase the importance gap between the clean and noisy behaviors for users with low user-specific inconsistency as their behaviors are more distinguishable. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets show that our proposed UDT outperforms state-of-the-art denoising recommendation methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3640457.3688109
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unified Denoising Training for Recommendation

Yingpeng Du, Ziyan Wang, Zhu Sun, Yew-Soon Ong et al.
4 citations
Recommender Systems and Techniques
3.12
article

Unified Denoising Training for Recommendation

Yingpeng Du, Ziyan Wang, Zhu Sun, Yew-Soon Ong, Jie Zhang, Haoyan Chua
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Most existing denoising recommendation methods alleviate noisy implicit feedback (user behaviors) through mainly empirical studies. However, such studies may lack theoretical explainability and fail to model comprehensive noise patterns, which hinders the understanding and capturing of different noise patterns that affect users’ behaviors. Thus, we propose to capture comprehensive noise patterns through theoretical and empirical analysis for more effective denoising, where users’ behaviors are divided into willingness and action phases to disentangle independent noise patterns. Willingness refers to the user’s intent to interact with an item, which may not lead to actual interaction due to different factors such as misclicking. Action denotes the user’s actual interaction with an item. Our analysis unveils that (1) in the willingness phase, high uncertainty in the user’s willingness to interact with the item can lead to high expectation loss which aligns with the findings of existing denoising methods; and (2) in the action phase, higher user-specific inconsistency between willingness and action not only leads to more noise in the user’s overall behaviors but also makes it harder to distinguish between true and noisy behaviors. Inspired by these findings, we propose a Unified Denoising Training (UDT) method for recommendation. To alleviate uncertainty in the willingness phase, we lower the importance of the user-item interaction with high willingness uncertainty recognized by high loss. To ease the inconsistency in the action phase, we lower the importance for users with high user-specific inconsistency as it may lead to noisier behaviors. Then, we increase the importance gap between the clean and noisy behaviors for users with low user-specific inconsistency as their behaviors are more distinguishable. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets show that our proposed UDT outperforms state-of-the-art denoising recommendation methods.

Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.