Leveraging LLM generated labels to reduce bad matches in job recommendations

Negative signals are increasingly employed to enhance recommendation quality. However, explicit negative feedback is often sparse and may disproportionately reflect the preferences of more vocal users. Commonly used implicit negative feedback, such as impressions without positive interactions, has the limitation of not accurately capturing users’ true negative preferences because users mainly pursue information they consider interesting. In this work, we present an approach that leverages fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) to evaluate recommendation quality and generate negative signals at scale while maintaining cost efficiency. We demonstrate significant improvements in our recommendation systems by deploying a traditional classifier trained using LLM-generated labels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3640457.3688043
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging LLM generated labels to reduce bad matches in job recommendations

Y. P. Pei, Dheeraj Toshniwal, Nilanjan Sengupta, Yi Wei Pang et al.
3 citations
Recommender Systems and Techniques
2.34
article

Leveraging LLM generated labels to reduce bad matches in job recommendations

Y. P. Pei, Dheeraj Toshniwal, Nilanjan Sengupta, Yi Wei Pang, Warren Cai
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Negative signals are increasingly employed to enhance recommendation quality. However, explicit negative feedback is often sparse and may disproportionately reflect the preferences of more vocal users. Commonly used implicit negative feedback, such as impressions without positive interactions, has the limitation of not accurately capturing users’ true negative preferences because users mainly pursue information they consider interesting. In this work, we present an approach that leverages fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) to evaluate recommendation quality and generate negative signals at scale while maintaining cost efficiency. We demonstrate significant improvements in our recommendation systems by deploying a traditional classifier trained using LLM-generated labels.

Data Storage Institute (SG)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.