Question-Attentive Review-Level Explanation for Neural Rating Regression

Recommendation explanations help to improve their acceptance by end users. Explanations come in many different forms. One that is of interest here is presenting an existing review of the recommended item as the explanation. The challenge is in selecting a suitable review, which is customarily addressed by assessing the relative importance or “attention” of each review to the recommendation objective. Our focus is improving review-level explanation by leveraging additional information in the form of questions and answers (QA). The proposed framework employs QA in an attention mechanism that aligns reviews to various QAs of an item and assesses their contribution jointly to the recommendation objective. The benefits are two-fold. For one, QA aids in selecting more useful reviews. For another, QA itself could accompany a well-aligned review in an expanded form of explanation. Experiments on datasets of 10 product categories showcase the efficacies of our method as compared to comparable baselines in identifying useful reviews and QAs, while maintaining parity in recommendation performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3699516
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Question-Attentive Review-Level Explanation for Neural Rating Regression

Trung-Hoang Le, Hady W. Lauw
1 citations
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
0.35
article

Question-Attentive Review-Level Explanation for Neural Rating Regression

Trung-Hoang Le, Hady W. Lauw
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recommendation explanations help to improve their acceptance by end users. Explanations come in many different forms. One that is of interest here is presenting an existing review of the recommended item as the explanation. The challenge is in selecting a suitable review, which is customarily addressed by assessing the relative importance or “attention” of each review to the recommendation objective. Our focus is improving review-level explanation by leveraging additional information in the form of questions and answers (QA). The proposed framework employs QA in an attention mechanism that aligns reviews to various QAs of an item and assesses their contribution jointly to the recommendation objective. The benefits are two-fold. For one, QA aids in selecting more useful reviews. For another, QA itself could accompany a well-aligned review in an expanded form of explanation. Experiments on datasets of 10 product categories showcase the efficacies of our method as compared to comparable baselines in identifying useful reviews and QAs, while maintaining parity in recommendation performance.

ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and TechnologyVol. 15(6)
Singapore Management University (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.