Large Language Models as Evaluators for Recommendation Explanations

The explainability of recommender systems has attracted significant attention in academia and industry. Many efforts have been made for explainable recommendations, yet evaluating the quality of the explanations remains a challenging and unresolved issue. In recent years, leveraging LLMs as evaluators presents a promising avenue in Natural Language Processing tasks (e.g., sentiment classification, information extraction), as they perform strong capabilities in instruction following and common-sense reasoning. However, evaluating recommendation explanatory texts is different from these NLG tasks, as its criteria are related to human perceptions and are usually subjective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3640457.3688075
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Models as Evaluators for Recommendation Explanations

Bowen Sun, Jiayin Wang, Peijie Sun, Yishan Li et al.
21 citations
Recommender Systems and Techniques
16.36
article

Large Language Models as Evaluators for Recommendation Explanations

Bowen Sun, Jiayin Wang, Peijie Sun, Yishan Li, Xiaoyu Zhang, Min Zhang, Weizhi Ma
article en
21 citations

Abstract

The explainability of recommender systems has attracted significant attention in academia and industry. Many efforts have been made for explainable recommendations, yet evaluating the quality of the explanations remains a challenging and unresolved issue. In recent years, leveraging LLMs as evaluators presents a promising avenue in Natural Language Processing tasks (e.g., sentiment classification, information extraction), as they perform strong capabilities in instruction following and common-sense reasoning. However, evaluating recommendation explanatory texts is different from these NLG tasks, as its criteria are related to human perceptions and are usually subjective.

Tsinghua University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
16.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.