A Comparative Analysis of Text-Based Explainable Recommender Systems
One way to increase trust among users towards recommender systems is to provide the recommendation along with a textual explanation. In the literature, extraction-based, generation-based, and, more recently, hybrid solutions based on retrieval-augmented generation have been proposed to tackle the problem of text-based explainable recommendation. However, the use of different datasets, preprocessing steps, target explanations, baselines, and evaluation metrics complicates the reproducibility and state-of-the-art assessment of previous work among different model categories for successful advancements in the field. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive analysis of text-based explainable recommender systems by setting up a well-defined benchmark that accommodates generation-based, extraction-based, and hybrid approaches. Also, we enrich the existing evaluation of explainability and text quality of the explanations with a novel definition of feature hallucination. Our experiments on three real-world datasets unveil hidden behaviors and confirm several claims about model patterns. Our source code and preprocessed datasets are available at https://github.com/alarca94/text-exp-recsys24.
Authors
- Ludovico Boratto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-3015)
- Alejandro Ariza-Casabona (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3388-2316)
- María Salamó (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-8963)
Institutions
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3640457.3688069
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.67
Funders
- Generalitat de Catalunya
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación