Social Choice for Heterogeneous Fairness in Recommendation
Algorithmic fairness in recommender systems requires close attention to the needs of a diverse set of stakeholders that may have competing interests. Previous work in this area has often been limited by fixed, single-objective definitions of fairness, built into algorithms or optimization criteria that are applied to a single fairness dimension or, at most, applied identically across dimensions. These narrow conceptualizations limit the ability to adapt fairness-aware solutions to the wide range of stakeholder needs and fairness definitions that arise in practice. Our work approaches recommendation fairness from the standpoint of computational social choice, using a multi-agent framework. In this paper, we explore the properties of different social choice mechanisms and demonstrate the successful integration of multiple, heterogeneous fairness definitions across multiple data sets.
Authors
- Nicholas Mattei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-4335)
- Amanda Aird (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0348-5843)
- Robin Burke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5766-6434)
- Amy Voida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2490-2063)
- Martin Homola (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6384-9771)
- Elena Štefancová (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-939X)
- Cassidy All (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7603-9951)
Institutions
- Tulane University (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3640457.3691706
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.58