CONSEQUENCES --- The 3rd Workshop on Causality, Counterfactuals and Sequential Decision-Making for Recommender Systems

Recommender systems are inherently decision-making systems, taking actions that have consequences for the world around them. Some consequences might be desirable (for example, growing the user base for an online platform), others might be unintended (for example, amplifying inequality among item providers). In order to reason about these consequences, we need to resort to methods from the literature on causal inference. Whilst this research area has seen a growing interest in recent years, there is an abundance of open research questions from how we should model large-scale recommender systems in such causal frameworks, to what the limitations are for causal identifiability in general settings, and how we can properly handle confounding variables. The CONSEQUENCES workshop series aims to bring together researchers and practitioners who are interested in this research topic, and wish to help shape its future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3640457.3687095
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONSEQUENCES --- The 3rd Workshop on Causality, Counterfactuals and Sequential Decision-Making for Recommender Systems

Harrie Oosterhuis, Flavian Vasile, Olivier Jeunen, Zhaoran Wang et al.
2 citations
Recommender Systems and Techniques
1.56
article

CONSEQUENCES --- The 3rd Workshop on Causality, Counterfactuals and Sequential Decision-Making for Recommender Systems

Harrie Oosterhuis, Flavian Vasile, Olivier Jeunen, Zhaoran Wang, Yuta Saito
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recommender systems are inherently decision-making systems, taking actions that have consequences for the world around them. Some consequences might be desirable (for example, growing the user base for an online platform), others might be unintended (for example, amplifying inequality among item providers). In order to reason about these consequences, we need to resort to methods from the literature on causal inference. Whilst this research area has seen a growing interest in recent years, there is an abundance of open research questions from how we should model large-scale recommender systems in such causal frameworks, to what the limitations are for causal identifiability in general settings, and how we can properly handle confounding variables. The CONSEQUENCES workshop series aims to bring together researchers and practitioners who are interested in this research topic, and wish to help shape its future.

Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Cornell University (US), University of Michigan (US), Criteo (France) (FR)
National Science Foundation, Michigan Institute for Data Science, University of Michigan, Office of Naval Research, Division of Chemistry
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.