Do Recommender Systems Promote Local Music? A Reproducibility Study Using Music Streaming Data

This paper examines the influence of recommender systems on local music representation, discussing prior findings from an empirical study on the LFM-2b public dataset 1. This prior study argued that different recommender systems exhibit algorithmic biases shifting music consumption either towards or against local content. However, LFM-2b users do not reflect the diverse audience of music streaming services. To assess the robustness of this study’s conclusions, we conduct a comparative analysis using proprietary listening data from a global music streaming service, which we publicly release alongside this paper. We observe significant differences in local music consumption patterns between our dataset and LFM-2b, suggesting that caution should be exercised when drawing conclusions on local music based solely on LFM-2b. Moreover, we show that the algorithmic biases exhibited in the original work vary in our dataset, and that several unexplored model parameters can significantly influence these biases and affect the study’s conclusion on both datasets. Finally, we discuss the complexity of accurately labeling local music, emphasizing the risk of misleading conclusions due to unreliable, biased, or incomplete labels. To encourage further research and ensure reproducibility, we have publicly shared our dataset and code.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3640457.3688065
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Music and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Recommender Systems Promote Local Music? A Reproducibility Study Using Music Streaming Data

Olivier Bodini, Manuel Moussallam, Thomas Louail, Guillaume Salha-Galvan et al.
4 citations
Music and Audio Processing
1.40
article

Do Recommender Systems Promote Local Music? A Reproducibility Study Using Music Streaming Data

Olivier Bodini, Manuel Moussallam, Thomas Louail, Guillaume Salha-Galvan, Kristina Matrosova, Lilian Marey
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the influence of recommender systems on local music representation, discussing prior findings from an empirical study on the LFM-2b public dataset 1. This prior study argued that different recommender systems exhibit algorithmic biases shifting music consumption either towards or against local content. However, LFM-2b users do not reflect the diverse audience of music streaming services. To assess the robustness of this study’s conclusions, we conduct a comparative analysis using proprietary listening data from a global music streaming service, which we publicly release alongside this paper. We observe significant differences in local music consumption patterns between our dataset and LFM-2b, suggesting that caution should be exercised when drawing conclusions on local music based solely on LFM-2b. Moreover, we show that the algorithmic biases exhibited in the original work vary in our dataset, and that several unexplored model parameters can significantly influence these biases and affect the study’s conclusion on both datasets. Finally, we discuss the complexity of accurately labeling local music, emphasizing the risk of misleading conclusions due to unreliable, biased, or incomplete labels. To encourage further research and ensure reproducibility, we have publicly shared our dataset and code.

Télécom Paris (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Laboratoire Pacte (FR), Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris-Nord (FR), Laboratoire Traitement et Communication de l’Information (FR), UMR Géographie-cités (FR), Sciences Po Grenoble
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Music and Audio Processing
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.