Assessing the Usability of iPREPARED: an Application-Based, Non-Pharmacological Delirium Prevention Intervention

Introduction: Non-pharmacologic prevention measures reduce incident delirium by up to 30-40%% in inpatient and ED settings, but consistent application is often difficult. A mobile health application, titled iPREPARED (Improve Prevention and Recovery by Engaging Patients and FAmily-Caregivers to End Delirium) was co-developed with patients and their care partners to prepare them for delirium and empower them to use non-pharmacological prevention measures. This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of iPREPARED in the emergency department (ED). Methods: An IRB-approved prospective study enrolled a convenience sample of ED patients over age 60 and/or their care partners. Participants were provided a tablet with the iPREPARED application and were given time to review the contents and ask questions. Then, either the patient, care partner, or both completed a 20-item validated anonymous questionnaire including: 1) accessibility, 2) understandability, and 3) educational value. We used the validated Mobile health Apps Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ), with a 1 “strongly disagree” to 7 “strongly agree” Likert scale. Acceptability was measured by the satisfaction and perceived value of the app, and feasibility was measured by the practical implementation in the real-world setting. Results: Slightly less than one half of the approached patients accepted to participate in the study. Questionnaires were completed by 40 participants (50% female). Questions addressing understandability, educational value, and ease of use had median ratings of 6 (IQR 5, 7) or 7 (6, 7). Individuals were less positive about iPREPARED improving access to healthcare services or managing health effectively (median 5 [4-7]) and noted a requirement for internet access. Reasons for declining participation included a language barrier (12%), feeling tired or not interested (17%), and feeling overwhelmed or uncomfortable (20%). Conclusion: It is feasible to implement mobile health applications in real world settings including the ED. Patients and care partners perceived iPREPARED positively, particularly in terms of understandability and educational value.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geriatric Emergency Medicine
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17294/2694-4715.1089
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Usability of iPREPARED: an Application-Based, Non-Pharmacological Delirium Prevention Intervention

Fernanda Bellolio, Heidi Lindroth, Molly M. Jeffery, Aidan F. Mullan et al.
2 citations
Journal of Geriatric Emergency Medicine
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
0.84
article

Assessing the Usability of iPREPARED: an Application-Based, Non-Pharmacological Delirium Prevention Intervention

Fernanda Bellolio, Heidi Lindroth, Molly M. Jeffery, Aidan F. Mullan, Ian Ward Abdalla Maia, Derek Vanmeter, Luke S Sztajnkrycer, Samantha Gracia, Grace Herbeck, Kayla P Carpenter
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Non-pharmacologic prevention measures reduce incident delirium by up to 30-40%% in inpatient and ED settings, but consistent application is often difficult. A mobile health application, titled iPREPARED (Improve Prevention and Recovery by Engaging Patients and FAmily-Caregivers to End Delirium) was co-developed with patients and their care partners to prepare them for delirium and empower them to use non-pharmacological prevention measures. This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of iPREPARED in the emergency department (ED). Methods: An IRB-approved prospective study enrolled a convenience sample of ED patients over age 60 and/or their care partners. Participants were provided a tablet with the iPREPARED application and were given time to review the contents and ask questions. Then, either the patient, care partner, or both completed a 20-item validated anonymous questionnaire including: 1) accessibility, 2) understandability, and 3) educational value. We used the validated Mobile health Apps Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ), with a 1 “strongly disagree” to 7 “strongly agree” Likert scale. Acceptability was measured by the satisfaction and perceived value of the app, and feasibility was measured by the practical implementation in the real-world setting. Results: Slightly less than one half of the approached patients accepted to participate in the study. Questionnaires were completed by 40 participants (50% female). Questions addressing understandability, educational value, and ease of use had median ratings of 6 (IQR 5, 7) or 7 (6, 7). Individuals were less positive about iPREPARED improving access to healthcare services or managing health effectively (median 5 [4-7]) and noted a requirement for internet access. Reasons for declining participation included a language barrier (12%), feeling tired or not interested (17%), and feeling overwhelmed or uncomfortable (20%). Conclusion: It is feasible to implement mobile health applications in real world settings including the ED. Patients and care partners perceived iPREPARED positively, particularly in terms of understandability and educational value.

Journal of Geriatric Emergency MedicineVol. 5(4)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.