Evaluation of Axial Flow Impeller Fabrication Process by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing and Machining

An evaluation was conducted on the fabrication of an axial flow impeller by a hybrid system of wire arc additive manufacturing and machining. First, a four-bladed stainless steel axial flow impeller was fabricated to measure the number of chips and fabrication time. Next, axial flow impellers with different numbers of blades were designed and compared with those fabricated only by machining from a round bar. In both cases, the number of chips was reduced by approximately 80% by using this system. On the other hand, the increase in the number of blades reduced the difference in fabrication time, which was almost the same with six blades. In conclusion, the use of this system is an option from the viewpoint of reducing environmental impact; however, it is not necessarily advantageous in terms of fabrication time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067061
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Axial Flow Impeller Fabrication Process by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing and Machining

Shinichiro Ejiri
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Evaluation of Axial Flow Impeller Fabrication Process by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing and Machining

Shinichiro Ejiri
article en

Abstract

An evaluation was conducted on the fabrication of an axial flow impeller by a hybrid system of wire arc additive manufacturing and machining. First, a four-bladed stainless steel axial flow impeller was fabricated to measure the number of chips and fabrication time. Next, axial flow impellers with different numbers of blades were designed and compared with those fabricated only by machining from a round bar. In both cases, the number of chips was reduced by approximately 80% by using this system. On the other hand, the increase in the number of blades reduced the difference in fabrication time, which was almost the same with six blades. In conclusion, the use of this system is an option from the viewpoint of reducing environmental impact; however, it is not necessarily advantageous in terms of fabrication time.

Nikkiso (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.