Factors affecting coaching in higher education: a meta-synthesis approach

Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify and investigate which factors affect coaching in higher education. Design/methodology/approach The study employed a qualitative meta-synthesis method. Based on the seven-step method (Sandelowski and Barroso, 2006), articles related to coaching in higher education were searched in five databases between 2012 and 2022. After step-by-step reviews and implementation of the critical evaluation skills program, 34 articles were selected from 1,711 sources. Findings Following the analysis of 58 obtained codes, seven sub-themes and three themes were extracted. The results showed that the key factors affecting coaching in higher education include individual (personal skills, personal attitudes, personal behaviors), structural (environmental contexts, organizational contexts), and managerial factors (planning actions, supporting actions). Practical implications The present study provides a framework for policy-making, implementation, evaluation and development of coaching programs in universities and provides a great help and support for planners and administrators of higher education institutions who want to design and implement coaching for the first time. Originality/value The presented factors provide effective information to higher education institutions so that they can offer coaching intervention more efficiently and help them allocate resources in a more efficient and strategic manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-02-2024-0027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coaching Methods and Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors affecting coaching in higher education: a meta-synthesis approach

Dorri Dolatkhah Laein, Reza Andam
1 citations
International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education
Coaching Methods and Impact
0.41
article

Factors affecting coaching in higher education: a meta-synthesis approach

Dorri Dolatkhah Laein, Reza Andam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify and investigate which factors affect coaching in higher education. Design/methodology/approach The study employed a qualitative meta-synthesis method. Based on the seven-step method (Sandelowski and Barroso, 2006), articles related to coaching in higher education were searched in five databases between 2012 and 2022. After step-by-step reviews and implementation of the critical evaluation skills program, 34 articles were selected from 1,711 sources. Findings Following the analysis of 58 obtained codes, seven sub-themes and three themes were extracted. The results showed that the key factors affecting coaching in higher education include individual (personal skills, personal attitudes, personal behaviors), structural (environmental contexts, organizational contexts), and managerial factors (planning actions, supporting actions). Practical implications The present study provides a framework for policy-making, implementation, evaluation and development of coaching programs in universities and provides a great help and support for planners and administrators of higher education institutions who want to design and implement coaching for the first time. Originality/value The presented factors provide effective information to higher education institutions so that they can offer coaching intervention more efficiently and help them allocate resources in a more efficient and strategic manner.

International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in EducationVol. 14(2)
University of Shahrood (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Coaching Methods and Impact
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.