Use your power for good: Collective action to overcome institutional injustices impeding ethical science communication in the academy

Abstract Science communication (scicomm) shapes our world by helping people use science to make societal and personal decisions. Supporting and doing ethical scicomm requires valuing diverse perspectives and the people who do scicomm. Unfortunately, institutional hurdles ingrained in academia impede and undermine ethical scicomm. The injustices impeding scicomm stem from the prestige paradigm of academia (articulated in the present article), which reinforces hierarchical relationships in an exclusionary and exploitative system. To move academia forward, we name and review these injustices through the lens of five realms of scicomm (scientific communication, teaching scicomm, academics engaging in scicomm, scicomm research, and scicomm careers beyond academia). We then provide a novel framework, helping readers identify axes of influence and how they can leverage their intersectional, academic capital to take concrete action to remove the hurdles impeding ethical scicomm in academia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae080
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use your power for good: Collective action to overcome institutional injustices impeding ethical science communication in the academy

E. Dale Broder, Robin M. Tinghitella, Eileen A. Hebets, Shannon M. Murphy et al.
3 citations
BioScience
Career Development and Diversity
1.58
article

Use your power for good: Collective action to overcome institutional injustices impeding ethical science communication in the academy

E. Dale Broder, Robin M. Tinghitella, Eileen A. Hebets, Shannon M. Murphy, Emily Weigel, Meena M. Balgopal, Anna A. Sher, Bethann Garramon Merkle, Jennifer Lee, Jennifer M Gumm, Chris J Schell, Joshua J Caffrey
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Science communication (scicomm) shapes our world by helping people use science to make societal and personal decisions. Supporting and doing ethical scicomm requires valuing diverse perspectives and the people who do scicomm. Unfortunately, institutional hurdles ingrained in academia impede and undermine ethical scicomm. The injustices impeding scicomm stem from the prestige paradigm of academia (articulated in the present article), which reinforces hierarchical relationships in an exclusionary and exploitative system. To move academia forward, we name and review these injustices through the lens of five realms of scicomm (scientific communication, teaching scicomm, academics engaging in scicomm, scicomm research, and scicomm careers beyond academia). We then provide a novel framework, helping readers identify axes of influence and how they can leverage their intersectional, academic capital to take concrete action to remove the hurdles impeding ethical scicomm in academia.

BioScienceVol. 74(11)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Wyoming (US), University of Minnesota (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Denver (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Front Range Community College (US), American University (US), Colorado State University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Career Development and Diversity
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.