Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry

Literary reading is an interactive process between a reader and a text that depends on a balance between cognitive effort and emotional rewards. By studying both the crucial features of the text and of the subjective reader reception, a better understanding of this interactive process can be reached. In the present study, subjects (<i>N</i>=31) read and rated a work of narrative fiction that was written in a poetic style, thereby offering the readers two pathways to cognitive rewards: Aesthetic appreciation and narrative immersion. Using purely text-based quantitative descriptors, we were able to independently and accurately predict the subjective ratings in the dimensions comprehensibility, valence, arousal, and liking across roughly 140 pages of naturalistic text. The specific text features that were most important in predicting each rating dimension are discussed in detail. In addition, the implications of the findings are discussed more generally in the context of existing models of literary processing and future research avenues for empirical literary studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry

Arthur M. Jacobs, Jana Lüdtke, Mesian Tilmatine
4 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.03
article

Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry

Arthur M. Jacobs, Jana Lüdtke, Mesian Tilmatine
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Literary reading is an interactive process between a reader and a text that depends on a balance between cognitive effort and emotional rewards. By studying both the crucial features of the text and of the subjective reader reception, a better understanding of this interactive process can be reached. In the present study, subjects (<i>N</i>=31) read and rated a work of narrative fiction that was written in a poetic style, thereby offering the readers two pathways to cognitive rewards: Aesthetic appreciation and narrative immersion. Using purely text-based quantitative descriptors, we were able to independently and accurately predict the subjective ratings in the dimensions comprehensibility, valence, arousal, and liking across roughly 140 pages of naturalistic text. The specific text features that were most important in predicting each rating dimension are discussed in detail. In addition, the implications of the findings are discussed more generally in the context of existing models of literary processing and future research avenues for empirical literary studies.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.