China ARCHES: A Phase 3 Trial of Enzalutamide vs Placebo in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide vs placebo, both combined with androgen deprivation therapy, in Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo, both in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. The primary trial end point was the time to prostate-specific antigen progression. Selected secondary end points included radiographic progression-free survival, time to castration resistance, time to initiation of new antineoplastic therapy, undetectable prostate-specific antigen (<0.2 ng/mL) rate among patients with detectable levels at baseline, and safety. Results: From September 11, 2019, to November 18, 2022, 180 patients were randomized to treatment (enzalutamide: n = 120; placebo: n = 60). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment arms. Median treatment duration in the enzalutamide vs the placebo arm was 25.66 vs 15.11 months. After 63 prostate-specific antigen progression events (enzalutamide: n = 23; placebo: n = 40), enzalutamide significantly reduced the hazard for prostate-specific antigen progression by 87% (hazard ratio: 0.130; 95% confidence interval: 0.076, 0.222; P < .0001) vs placebo. Radiographic progression-free survival, time to castration resistance, and achievement of undetectable prostate-specific antigen levels were increased with enzalutamide vs placebo, while treatment-emergent adverse event rates were similar. Serious and grade 3 to 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 35.3% and 52.1%, respectively, of enzalutamide recipients vs 20.3% and 39.0%, respectively, of placebo recipients. Conclusions: In Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, enzalutamide significantly reduced the hazard for prostate-specific antigen progression vs placebo when combined with androgen deprivation therapy. The China ARCHES (NCT04076059) results were consistent with those of the global ARCHES study (NCT02677896).
Authors
- Hongqian Guo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-667X)
- Fangjian Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-8151)
- Yuan Chang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2042-9317)
- Haishan Kadeerbai
- Zhiquan Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6017-9108)
- Gongqian Zeng
- Dalin He (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-7935)
- Xiaoping Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-4989)
- Yuning Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-9667)
- Dahong Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-8239)
- Yonghong Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-7242)
- Dingwei Ye (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-0260)
- Zhisong He
Institutions
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- Astellas Pharma (China) (CN)
- Health First (US)
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN)
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN)
- Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN)
- Wuhan Union Hospital (CN)
- Peking University First Hospital (CN)
- Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
- Tongji Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JU Open Plus
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000198
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.84