Estimating Real Seismicity Rates from Nonhomogeneously Recorded Earthquake Catalogs

Abstract Accurate estimation of seismic activity using epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) models for small earthquakes is complicated by the incompleteness of the aftershock catalog immediately following frequent large earthquakes. For example, in conventional aftershock analysis using the ETAS model, the earthquakes immediately following the mainshock, including the mainshock, are used only as a history, and the estimate is based on data for subsequent segments above the lower magnitude limit where detection completeness can be guaranteed. However, the high activity in the missing interval itself contains important clues to the physical structure associated with the immediate aftershocks. In this article, I consider all detected seismic data, even if incomplete. I try to estimate the detection probability of each earthquake in the catalog and show how to estimate the real underlying activity of the ETAS and nonstationary ETAS models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismological Research Letters
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240153
Citations
4
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Real Seismicity Rates from Nonhomogeneously Recorded Earthquake Catalogs

Yosihiko Ogata
4 citations
Seismological Research Letters
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.14
article

Estimating Real Seismicity Rates from Nonhomogeneously Recorded Earthquake Catalogs

Yosihiko Ogata
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Accurate estimation of seismic activity using epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) models for small earthquakes is complicated by the incompleteness of the aftershock catalog immediately following frequent large earthquakes. For example, in conventional aftershock analysis using the ETAS model, the earthquakes immediately following the mainshock, including the mainshock, are used only as a history, and the estimate is based on data for subsequent segments above the lower magnitude limit where detection completeness can be guaranteed. However, the high activity in the missing interval itself contains important clues to the physical structure associated with the immediate aftershocks. In this article, I consider all detected seismic data, even if incomplete. I try to estimate the detection probability of each earthquake in the catalog and show how to estimate the real underlying activity of the ETAS and nonstationary ETAS models.

Seismological Research LettersVol. 95(6)
The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimating Real Seismicity Rates from Nonhomogeneously Recorded Earthquake Catalogs — Yosihiko Ogata · Seismological Research Letters (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS