Steady-State Shape Factor for a Slug Test in an Unconfined Aquifer

A new solution is presented for the steady-state shape factor of a partially penetrating well in an unconfined aquifer. The problem is solved by taking into account mixed boundary conditions at the well, i.e., zero flux at the well casing and constant head at the well screen equal to the head in the well so that the flow through the well screen is non-uniform. The new method is compared with established methods, such as those of Bouwer and Rice and Zlotnik et al., demonstrating that the new approach provides more accurate results under certain conditions. The comparison highlights that the new method is particularly effective in scenarios where the assumptions of uniform flow through the well screen do not hold. This study assumes idealized conditions, such as homogeneity, isotropy, and negligible storativity in the aquifer, which may limit the method’s applicability in more complex environments. The computational demands of the iterative solution process may pose challenges for practical use, especially in resource-constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192853
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steady-State Shape Factor for a Slug Test in an Unconfined Aquifer

Florimond De Smedt
1 citations
Water
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.21
article

Steady-State Shape Factor for a Slug Test in an Unconfined Aquifer

Florimond De Smedt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A new solution is presented for the steady-state shape factor of a partially penetrating well in an unconfined aquifer. The problem is solved by taking into account mixed boundary conditions at the well, i.e., zero flux at the well casing and constant head at the well screen equal to the head in the well so that the flow through the well screen is non-uniform. The new method is compared with established methods, such as those of Bouwer and Rice and Zlotnik et al., demonstrating that the new approach provides more accurate results under certain conditions. The comparison highlights that the new method is particularly effective in scenarios where the assumptions of uniform flow through the well screen do not hold. This study assumes idealized conditions, such as homogeneity, isotropy, and negligible storativity in the aquifer, which may limit the method’s applicability in more complex environments. The computational demands of the iterative solution process may pose challenges for practical use, especially in resource-constrained settings.

WaterVol. 16(19)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Steady-State Shape Factor for a Slug Test in an Unconfined Aquifer — Florimond De Smedt · Water (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS