A Little of that Human Touch: How Regular Journalists Redefine Their Expertise in the Face of Artificial Intelligence

Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence raise fundamental questions about its impact on the journalistic profession and the future role of journalists in news production. However, the attitudes of regular journalists towards artificial intelligence remain largely unexplored. We address this gap by investigating the potentials and concerns that Danish journalists attribute to the impact of artificial intelligence on journalism. Journalists largely acknowledge its potential to streamline news production. While they also express broader concerns about the trustworthiness of journalism and the risk of job displacement, their more immediate worry lies in the impact of artificial intelligence on job meaningfulness and professional identity. These findings reveal a differentiated perspective on the profession-wide and individual impacts of artificial intelligence on journalism. Furthermore, journalists emphasise their human qualities and skills such as nuanced judgement, empathy, and creativity as beyond artificial intelligence’s capabilities. This indicates that artificial intelligence prompts journalists to reshape their expertise to prioritise the human touch in journalism, suggesting a broadened view of the journalistic profession. By examining these perceptions among regular journalists, this study contributes to a better understanding of the multifaceted challenges that artificial intelligence poses to both individual journalistic practices and the broader profession.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism Studies
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2024.2412212
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Little of that Human Touch: How Regular Journalists Redefine Their Expertise in the Face of Artificial Intelligence

Morten Skovsgaard, Arjen van Dalen, Lynge Asbjørn Møller
22 citations
Journalism Studies
Media Studies and Communication
21.06
article

A Little of that Human Touch: How Regular Journalists Redefine Their Expertise in the Face of Artificial Intelligence

Morten Skovsgaard, Arjen van Dalen, Lynge Asbjørn Møller
article en
22 citations

Abstract

Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence raise fundamental questions about its impact on the journalistic profession and the future role of journalists in news production. However, the attitudes of regular journalists towards artificial intelligence remain largely unexplored. We address this gap by investigating the potentials and concerns that Danish journalists attribute to the impact of artificial intelligence on journalism. Journalists largely acknowledge its potential to streamline news production. While they also express broader concerns about the trustworthiness of journalism and the risk of job displacement, their more immediate worry lies in the impact of artificial intelligence on job meaningfulness and professional identity. These findings reveal a differentiated perspective on the profession-wide and individual impacts of artificial intelligence on journalism. Furthermore, journalists emphasise their human qualities and skills such as nuanced judgement, empathy, and creativity as beyond artificial intelligence’s capabilities. This indicates that artificial intelligence prompts journalists to reshape their expertise to prioritise the human touch in journalism, suggesting a broadened view of the journalistic profession. By examining these perceptions among regular journalists, this study contributes to a better understanding of the multifaceted challenges that artificial intelligence poses to both individual journalistic practices and the broader profession.

Journalism StudiesVol. 26(1)
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Media Studies and Communication
21.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.