Comparative Analysis of Thermal Activation on Felts and Continuous Carbon Filament Electrodes for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries

Abstract Thermal treatments are commonly used to improve electrode kinetics in vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFB). The impact of the widely adopted thermal treatment—400 °C for least 24 hours—was investigated on polyacrylonitrile (PAN)‐based continuous carbon filaments (tows) and compared to PAN‐based graphite felts. Surface properties were assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and wettability measurements. The electrode activity was investigated via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Charge‐transfer resistances and the constant phase element parameters related to the electric double layer were determined, revealing a correlation between enhanced electrode activity and increased double layer across all electrodes. An 8‐hour 400 °C thermal treatment was sufficient to improve electrode activity for tows, whereas felts required longer durations, up to 24 hours, attributed to differences in the carbonization process employed for each material, with the tows undergoing continuous processing and the felts following a batch process. Three‐electrode half‐cell EIS measurements were conducted to elucidate positive and negative electrode contributions. Activated continuous carbon filament electrodes exhibited consistent electrode activities in both the catholyte (VO 2 + /VO 2+ ) and anolyte (V 3+ /V 2+ ), whereas the electrochemical activity of felts was limited by the electrode deactivation in the anolyte.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemElectroChem
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202400417
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced battery technologies research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Thermal Activation on Felts and Continuous Carbon Filament Electrodes for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries

Jhonatan Rodríguez‐Pereira, Roger Amade, Rogelio Ospina, Thomas Bechtold et al.
4 citations
ChemElectroChem
Advanced battery technologies research
0.83
article

Comparative Analysis of Thermal Activation on Felts and Continuous Carbon Filament Electrodes for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries

Jhonatan Rodríguez‐Pereira, Roger Amade, Rogelio Ospina, Thomas Bechtold, Tung Pham, Noemí Aguiló‐Aguayo, Carlos Ponce de León, Enric Bertran, Toni Alena Ebert
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Thermal treatments are commonly used to improve electrode kinetics in vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFB). The impact of the widely adopted thermal treatment—400 °C for least 24 hours—was investigated on polyacrylonitrile (PAN)‐based continuous carbon filaments (tows) and compared to PAN‐based graphite felts. Surface properties were assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and wettability measurements. The electrode activity was investigated via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Charge‐transfer resistances and the constant phase element parameters related to the electric double layer were determined, revealing a correlation between enhanced electrode activity and increased double layer across all electrodes. An 8‐hour 400 °C thermal treatment was sufficient to improve electrode activity for tows, whereas felts required longer durations, up to 24 hours, attributed to differences in the carbonization process employed for each material, with the tows undergoing continuous processing and the felts following a batch process. Three‐electrode half‐cell EIS measurements were conducted to elucidate positive and negative electrode contributions. Activated continuous carbon filament electrodes exhibited consistent electrode activities in both the catholyte (VO 2 + /VO 2+ ) and anolyte (V 3+ /V 2+ ), whereas the electrochemical activity of felts was limited by the electrode deactivation in the anolyte.

ChemElectroChemVol. 11(21)
Universidad Industrial de Santander (CO), Central European Institute of Technology (CZ), University of Pardubice (CZ), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Southampton (GB), Brno University of Technology (CZ), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Bundesministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie, Austrian Science Fund, Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft, Bundesministerium für Digitalisierung und Wirtschaftsstandort
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Advanced battery technologies research
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.