Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics—Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives

Can nonhuman animals be used for the benefit of humans in a scientifically and morally justified manner and, if yes, how? Based on our own experiences as scholars from various academic backgrounds, we argue that this question can only be answered as an interdisciplinary and international endeavor, considering insights from research ethics and animal ethics as well as scientific and legal aspects. The aim of this article is to contribute to the foundation of the emerging field of animal research ethics. In doing so, we describe the following seven phases of animal research experiments: ethical, legal and social presumptions (phase 0), planning (phase I), review (phase II), conduct of experiments (phase III), publication/dissemination (phase IV), further exploitation of results (phase V), and evaluation (phase VI). In total, 16 key ethical, legal, and practical challenges that an ethical framework for the use of animals in research needs to address are identified and analyzed. Finally, we characterize the following four meta-challenges and opportunities associated with animal research ethics as a field: (1) moral pluralism, (2) the integration of views and positions outside the laboratory, (3) international plurality of conduct, standards, and legal norms, and (4) interdisciplinary education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192896
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics—Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives

Marcel Mertz, Svea Jörgensen, Sara Capas-Peneda, Zorana Todorović et al.
6 citations
Animals
Animal testing and alternatives
3.83
article

Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics—Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives

Marcel Mertz, Svea Jörgensen, Sara Capas-Peneda, Zorana Todorović, Felicitas Selter, Eva I. Reihs, Karla Alex, Samuel Camenzind, Vini Tiwari, Hannes Kahrass, Erich Linder, Tatiana Hetzel, Rita Dodaro, Katharina Braun
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Can nonhuman animals be used for the benefit of humans in a scientifically and morally justified manner and, if yes, how? Based on our own experiences as scholars from various academic backgrounds, we argue that this question can only be answered as an interdisciplinary and international endeavor, considering insights from research ethics and animal ethics as well as scientific and legal aspects. The aim of this article is to contribute to the foundation of the emerging field of animal research ethics. In doing so, we describe the following seven phases of animal research experiments: ethical, legal and social presumptions (phase 0), planning (phase I), review (phase II), conduct of experiments (phase III), publication/dissemination (phase IV), further exploitation of results (phase V), and evaluation (phase VI). In total, 16 key ethical, legal, and practical challenges that an ethical framework for the use of animals in research needs to address are identified and analyzed. Finally, we characterize the following four meta-challenges and opportunities associated with animal research ethics as a field: (1) moral pluralism, (2) the integration of views and positions outside the laboratory, (3) international plurality of conduct, standards, and legal norms, and (4) interdisciplinary education.

AnimalsVol. 14(19)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Heidelberg University (DE), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), University of Belgrade (RS), Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), University of Calabria (IT), Technical University of Munich (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Animal testing and alternatives
3.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.