The Moderating Role of Affective Polarization on Party Cues: The Case of the Prostitution Ban

Affective polarization is a recent yet widespread phenomenon in democracies that significantly impacts various aspects of politics. In this paper, we argue that it can also shape citizens’ political beliefs through party cues. Using a panel survey experiment in Spain, we examine the extent to which partisan signals influence citizens’ attitudes toward a non-party- branded issue, specifically the ban on prostitution, and how affective polarization moderates this effect. Our results underscore the role of affective polarization in moderating the influence of partisan cues, particularly among highly polarized individuals. These findings highlight the capacity of affective polarization not only to deepen political divisions but also to expand the scope of partisan influence to non-politicized and neutral issues, offering new insights into its potential impact on attitude formation and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241285019
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Moderating Role of Affective Polarization on Party Cues: The Case of the Prostitution Ban

Patricia Otero Felipe, Juan Antonio Rodríguez Zepeda, Leonardo Sánchez-Ferrer
American Behavioral Scientist
Gender Politics and Representation
article

The Moderating Role of Affective Polarization on Party Cues: The Case of the Prostitution Ban

Patricia Otero Felipe, Juan Antonio Rodríguez Zepeda, Leonardo Sánchez-Ferrer
article en

Abstract

Affective polarization is a recent yet widespread phenomenon in democracies that significantly impacts various aspects of politics. In this paper, we argue that it can also shape citizens’ political beliefs through party cues. Using a panel survey experiment in Spain, we examine the extent to which partisan signals influence citizens’ attitudes toward a non-party- branded issue, specifically the ban on prostitution, and how affective polarization moderates this effect. Our results underscore the role of affective polarization in moderating the influence of partisan cues, particularly among highly polarized individuals. These findings highlight the capacity of affective polarization not only to deepen political divisions but also to expand the scope of partisan influence to non-politicized and neutral issues, offering new insights into its potential impact on attitude formation and decision-making.

American Behavioral Scientist
Universidad de Burgos (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Moderating Role of Affective Polarization on Party Cues: The Case of the Prostitution Ban — Patricia Otero Felipe, Juan Antonio Rodríguez Zepeda, et al. · American Behavioral Scientist (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS