Evaluating Driver Response to Bridge Deck Warning Systems During Winter Weather Conditions

Warning signs are often deployed at bridge overpasses during winter to warn motorists of potentially icy surface conditions on the bridge, although the effectiveness of these signs is questionable. One potential improvement to the standard signage methods is the bridge deck warning system (BDWS), which activates a flashing warning sign border or beacon when conditions warrant based on real-time weather and bridge surface data. However, BDWSs have not been broadly implemented in the United States, and consequently, their effectiveness as a safety countermeasure is not well established. To address this knowledge gap, a series of winter field evaluations were performed along three freeway bridge overpasses in Michigan to assess the effectiveness of various BDWS strategies as a speed reduction countermeasure for motorists approaching a potentially icy bridge. The results showed that a BDWS with a flashing light emitting diode (LED) border reduced motorist speeds when encountering a bridge during winter weather conditions compared with the standard “Bridge Ices Before Road” warning sign. The speed reduction effect was consistent between passenger cars and heavy trucks, but was somewhat stronger at night compared with daytime. Greater speed reductions were observed when the BDWS sign was combined with a dynamic speed feedback sign (DSFS) that displayed a “Slow Down” or “Icy Road” message to approaching motorists, with the strongest effects observed when the DSFS message was pulsed between high and low brightness intensities. BDWSs that included only a flashing overhead beacon did not have a significant effect on speeds compared with the standard warning sign.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241284615
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Driver Response to Bridge Deck Warning Systems During Winter Weather Conditions

Sakar Pahari, Md Shakir Mahmud, Timothy J. Gates, Peter Tarmo Savolainen et al.
4 citations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Traffic and Road Safety
1.46
article

Evaluating Driver Response to Bridge Deck Warning Systems During Winter Weather Conditions

Sakar Pahari, Md Shakir Mahmud, Timothy J. Gates, Peter Tarmo Savolainen, Darko Babić, Magdalena Čavka, Sagar Keshari, Myles W. Overall, Sarah Premo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Warning signs are often deployed at bridge overpasses during winter to warn motorists of potentially icy surface conditions on the bridge, although the effectiveness of these signs is questionable. One potential improvement to the standard signage methods is the bridge deck warning system (BDWS), which activates a flashing warning sign border or beacon when conditions warrant based on real-time weather and bridge surface data. However, BDWSs have not been broadly implemented in the United States, and consequently, their effectiveness as a safety countermeasure is not well established. To address this knowledge gap, a series of winter field evaluations were performed along three freeway bridge overpasses in Michigan to assess the effectiveness of various BDWS strategies as a speed reduction countermeasure for motorists approaching a potentially icy bridge. The results showed that a BDWS with a flashing light emitting diode (LED) border reduced motorist speeds when encountering a bridge during winter weather conditions compared with the standard “Bridge Ices Before Road” warning sign. The speed reduction effect was consistent between passenger cars and heavy trucks, but was somewhat stronger at night compared with daytime. Greater speed reductions were observed when the BDWS sign was combined with a dynamic speed feedback sign (DSFS) that displayed a “Slow Down” or “Icy Road” message to approaching motorists, with the strongest effects observed when the DSFS message was pulsed between high and low brightness intensities. BDWSs that included only a flashing overhead beacon did not have a significant effect on speeds compared with the standard warning sign.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardVol. 2679(3)
University of Zagreb (HR), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Traffic and Road Safety
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.