The Immigration‐Related Political Ideology Scale: Development, factor structure, and validity evidence

Abstract The aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Immigration‐Related Political Ideology Scale (IRPIS), designed to measure diverse political perspectives on immigration among US voters. The IRPIS was developed following a series of focus groups and refined through a systematic item‐generation process involving expert panels. The scale was validated using a two‐step factor analysis with a nationally representative sample of 1292 US voters, divided into exploratory ( n = 632) and confirmatory ( n = 660) sub‐samples. The exploratory factor analysis identified seven distinct factors: conservative views, welcoming attitudes, world regions, flexibility, assimilationist expectations, multicultural expectations, and undocumented immigrant rights. Confirmatory factor analysis provided an acceptable fit (CFI = .901; RMSEA = .050), and the scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas ranging from .89 to .97). Inter‐factor correlations varied, with strong links observed among welcoming attitudes, flexibility, and multicultural expectations ( r ’s > .80), confirming a polarization between liberal and conservative stances on immigration. These findings suggest that the IRPIS is the first scale specifically designed to assess immigration‐related political orientations in a polarized US context. This tool has important implications for political strategy and policymaking, especially in the context of rising immigration rates and political polarization. Public Significance Statement The present study validates the Immigration‐Related Political Ideology Scale (IRPIS) using a nationally representative sample of 1292 US voters. Immigration remains a highly polarizing issue, with deeply entrenched ideological differences influencing policy preferences and public discourse. Exploratory factor analysis identified seven distinct factors and confirmed a clear polarization between liberal and conservative views on immigration. The IRPIS represents a critical tool for research, political strategy, and policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12429
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Immigration‐Related Political Ideology Scale: Development, factor structure, and validity evidence

Deborah J. Schildkraut, Pablo Montero‐Zamora, David De Coninck, Beyhan Ertanir et al.
3 citations
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Social Media and Politics
2.87
article

The Immigration‐Related Political Ideology Scale: Development, factor structure, and validity evidence

Deborah J. Schildkraut, Pablo Montero‐Zamora, David De Coninck, Beyhan Ertanir, Seth J. Schwartz, Sümeyra Sahbaz, Natalia Bogado, Aigerim Alpysbekova, Mia M Cisco, Maria Duque, Duyen H Vo, Carolina Scaramutti Gladfelter, Lea Nehme‐Kotocavage
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Immigration‐Related Political Ideology Scale (IRPIS), designed to measure diverse political perspectives on immigration among US voters. The IRPIS was developed following a series of focus groups and refined through a systematic item‐generation process involving expert panels. The scale was validated using a two‐step factor analysis with a nationally representative sample of 1292 US voters, divided into exploratory ( n = 632) and confirmatory ( n = 660) sub‐samples. The exploratory factor analysis identified seven distinct factors: conservative views, welcoming attitudes, world regions, flexibility, assimilationist expectations, multicultural expectations, and undocumented immigrant rights. Confirmatory factor analysis provided an acceptable fit (CFI = .901; RMSEA = .050), and the scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas ranging from .89 to .97). Inter‐factor correlations varied, with strong links observed among welcoming attitudes, flexibility, and multicultural expectations ( r ’s > .80), confirming a polarization between liberal and conservative stances on immigration. These findings suggest that the IRPIS is the first scale specifically designed to assess immigration‐related political orientations in a polarized US context. This tool has important implications for political strategy and policymaking, especially in the context of rising immigration rates and political polarization. Public Significance Statement The present study validates the Immigration‐Related Political Ideology Scale (IRPIS) using a nationally representative sample of 1292 US voters. Immigration remains a highly polarizing issue, with deeply entrenched ideological differences influencing policy preferences and public discourse. Exploratory factor analysis identified seven distinct factors and confirmed a clear polarization between liberal and conservative views on immigration. The IRPIS represents a critical tool for research, political strategy, and policymaking.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 25(1)
Boston College (US), Tufts University (US), University of Miami (US), University of Basel (CH), Florida International University (US), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), The University of Texas at Austin (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Media and Politics
2.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.