The Formal and Informal Regulation of Labor in AI: The Experience of Eastern and Southern Africa

The spread of AI technologies has had far reaching consequences for work and employment regulation around the world. This conceptual paper explores the case of AI and formal and informal regulation in southern and east Africa, according particular attention to the cases of South Africa and Kenya. Within the region, governments seem primarily concerned with the potential of AI to promote economic diversification, rather than the protection of employees whose work autonomy-and, indeed, jobs-have been affected by the rise of AI technologies. There have been periodic efforts to promote codes of conduct, but these are primarily voluntary and industry centred. Unions and ad hoc worker associations have sought to push back; here, progress has been very uneven, although in some cases, this has made for employers accepting the need for basic rules of fair play. Meanwhile, several governments in the region have purchased AI technologies to monitor citizens and have deployed them against unions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939241278956c
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Formal and Informal Regulation of Labor in AI: The Experience of Eastern and Southern Africa

Geoffrey Wood, Christine Bischoff, Ken Kamoche
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

The Formal and Informal Regulation of Labor in AI: The Experience of Eastern and Southern Africa

Geoffrey Wood, Christine Bischoff, Ken Kamoche
article en

Abstract

The spread of AI technologies has had far reaching consequences for work and employment regulation around the world. This conceptual paper explores the case of AI and formal and informal regulation in southern and east Africa, according particular attention to the cases of South Africa and Kenya. Within the region, governments seem primarily concerned with the potential of AI to promote economic diversification, rather than the protection of employees whose work autonomy-and, indeed, jobs-have been affected by the rise of AI technologies. There have been periodic efforts to promote codes of conduct, but these are primarily voluntary and industry centred. Unions and ad hoc worker associations have sought to push back; here, progress has been very uneven, although in some cases, this has made for employers accepting the need for basic rules of fair play. Meanwhile, several governments in the region have purchased AI technologies to monitor citizens and have deployed them against unions.

Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewVol. 77(5)
Western University (CA), University of Nottingham (GB), Cranfield University (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Formal and Informal Regulation of Labor in AI: The Experience of Eastern and Southern Africa — Geoffrey Wood, Christine Bischoff, et al. · Industrial and Labor Relations Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS