Can Microcavitated Slippery Surfaces Outperform Micropillared and Untextured?

Surface features' morphology is crucial in designing lubricant-infused slippery surfaces (LIS). Microcavities were hypothesized to provide lower physical pinning, reduced droplet normal adhesion, and superior lubricant retention as compared to micropillars and untextured surfaces. Micropillars and microcavities (<i>h</i> = 10 ± 3 μm, <i>d</i> = 8 ± 1 μm, <i>p</i> = 17 ± 3 μm, <i>r</i>_w = 1.4 ± 0.2) were replicated on polydimethylsiloxane from Lotus leaf and were coated with 1000 cSt silicone oil films (530 nm-27 μm thick). Water wetting, water-oil thermodynamic stability, droplet's normal adhesion and oil shear drainage properties were investigated to evaluate the relative performance of microcavitated, micropillared and untextured LIS. For ≤7 μm thick oil films, cavitated and untextured LIS displayed superior slippery properties than micropillared LIS (16 ± 1°, 7 ± 1°, 30 ± 4° slide-off angles respectively). Also, normal adhesion is of the order: cavities < untextured < pillars, and smaller than their dry counterparts. Furthermore, the oil retention efficiency under the action of centrifugal forces and continuous shear flow of water is of the order: pillars > cavities > untextured. Thus, it can be concluded that microcavitated LIS can outperform micropillared and untextured LIS.