Sugarcane Leaf Disease Classification Using Hybrid CNN and RNN

Deep learning methods have shown promise in automating agricultural disease diagnosis. In this paper, a comparison of a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model and a hybrid Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) model for identifying leaf diseases to determine which approach performs better in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The hybrid CNN, integrating EfficientNet and DenseNet, excels in image-based tasks, while the hybrid RNN, combining SimpleRNN and LSTM, is suited for sequential data processing. The objective is to assess these models based on performance metrics, computational complexity, generalization, and application suitability. Empirical testing shows the hybrid CNN achieved 94.8% accuracy and efficiency, outperforming the hybrid RNN's 36.4% accuracy and 4% efficiency. The results provide insights into each model's strengths and limitations, aiding decision-making for data analysis tasks. The choice between hybrid CNN and hybrid RNN models depends on data type and task requirements.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icecsp61809.2024.10698161
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sugarcane Leaf Disease Classification Using Hybrid CNN and RNN

Samiappan Dhanalakshmi, A. Rajeswari, Suhasini Vijaykumar, T Gokul et al.
2 citations
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.20
article

Sugarcane Leaf Disease Classification Using Hybrid CNN and RNN

Samiappan Dhanalakshmi, A. Rajeswari, Suhasini Vijaykumar, T Gokul, M K kesavaa, M Harish
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Deep learning methods have shown promise in automating agricultural disease diagnosis. In this paper, a comparison of a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model and a hybrid Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) model for identifying leaf diseases to determine which approach performs better in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The hybrid CNN, integrating EfficientNet and DenseNet, excels in image-based tasks, while the hybrid RNN, combining SimpleRNN and LSTM, is suited for sequential data processing. The objective is to assess these models based on performance metrics, computational complexity, generalization, and application suitability. Empirical testing shows the hybrid CNN achieved 94.8% accuracy and efficiency, outperforming the hybrid RNN's 36.4% accuracy and 4% efficiency. The results provide insights into each model's strengths and limitations, aiding decision-making for data analysis tasks. The choice between hybrid CNN and hybrid RNN models depends on data type and task requirements.

Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.