Plasma Physics at Comets – What can we learn from laboratory experiments?

Diamagnetic cavities at comets were predicted already in the 1960s [1], and then observed at comet 1P/Halley by the ESA/Giotto spacecraft in 1986 [2]. Recently, the ESA/Rosetta spacecraft spent two years orbiting comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and encountered the diamagnetic cavity of comet 67P more than 700 times [3, 4]. Most encounters lasted a few minutes, with the duration varying from a few seconds up to more than 30 minutes. As the spacecraft moved very slowly (~1ms<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−1</sup>), it can be considered stationary with respect to the plasma. Therefore, the quick succession of detections indicates that the boundary of the diamagnetic cavity moved over the spacecraft. Figure 1 (left) shows three diamagnetic cavity signatures observed with the plasma instruments on Rosetta on 16 September 2015 when the comet was close to perihelion. Rosetta was in the diamagnetic cavity during the periods of nearly zero magnetic field (marked by the coloured regions). Outside the cavity. the plasma was often characterised by a series of asymmetric. steepened waves which are visible in the magnetic field. as well as in the plasma density [5]. Since all observations to date have been made using a single spacecraft. the shape of the diamagnetic cavity boundary cannot be well constrained by measurements. However. it has been suggested. based on wave observations. that bulges on the cavity boundary move past the spacecraft. causing the latter to quickly move in and out of the cavity [6].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceaa61917.2024.10701783
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma Physics at Comets – What can we learn from laboratory experiments?

Gabriella Stenberg Wieser, H. Gunell, Charlotte Goetz, Cyril Simon Wedlund et al.
Astro and Planetary Science
article

Plasma Physics at Comets – What can we learn from laboratory experiments?

Gabriella Stenberg Wieser, H. Gunell, Charlotte Goetz, Cyril Simon Wedlund, H. Nilsson, Anja Moeslinger, N. J. T. Edberg, Derek B. Schaeffer, Filipe Cruz
article en

Abstract

Diamagnetic cavities at comets were predicted already in the 1960s [1], and then observed at comet 1P/Halley by the ESA/Giotto spacecraft in 1986 [2]. Recently, the ESA/Rosetta spacecraft spent two years orbiting comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and encountered the diamagnetic cavity of comet 67P more than 700 times [3, 4]. Most encounters lasted a few minutes, with the duration varying from a few seconds up to more than 30 minutes. As the spacecraft moved very slowly (~1ms<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−1</sup>), it can be considered stationary with respect to the plasma. Therefore, the quick succession of detections indicates that the boundary of the diamagnetic cavity moved over the spacecraft. Figure 1 (left) shows three diamagnetic cavity signatures observed with the plasma instruments on Rosetta on 16 September 2015 when the comet was close to perihelion. Rosetta was in the diamagnetic cavity during the periods of nearly zero magnetic field (marked by the coloured regions). Outside the cavity. the plasma was often characterised by a series of asymmetric. steepened waves which are visible in the magnetic field. as well as in the plasma density [5]. Since all observations to date have been made using a single spacecraft. the shape of the diamagnetic cavity boundary cannot be well constrained by measurements. However. it has been suggested. based on wave observations. that bulges on the cavity boundary move past the spacecraft. causing the latter to quickly move in and out of the cavity [6].

Swedish Institute of Space Physics (SE), Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT), University of Lisbon (PT), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Northumbria University (GB), Space Research Institute (AT), Lusíada University of Lisbon (PT), Umeå University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.