A Mixed Methods Analysis of General Education Candidates’ Knowledge, Perceptions, and Application of Universal Design for Learning

Thirty general education candidates from elementary education, middle/secondary education, and arts education in multiple sections of one course engaged in a series of discussion posts and lesson plans related to creating inclusive general education lessons. Using candidate posts, rubric scores, feedback on lesson plans, and course evaluation ratings, a mixed methods approach was used to understand candidate knowledge, perceptions, and applications of Universal Design for Learning. The results from our research have important implications for policy, practice, and research. Policy makers must be aware of the lack of UDL in general education programs and IHEs need to do more than the cursory coverage of these principles. Additional research is needed for the implementation of lessons designed using UDL by general education candidates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Higher Education
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040048
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed Methods Analysis of General Education Candidates’ Knowledge, Perceptions, and Application of Universal Design for Learning

Cindy M. Gilson, Holly Johnson, Shawnee Wakeman
1 citations
Trends in Higher Education
Disability Education and Employment
0.53
article

A Mixed Methods Analysis of General Education Candidates’ Knowledge, Perceptions, and Application of Universal Design for Learning

Cindy M. Gilson, Holly Johnson, Shawnee Wakeman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Thirty general education candidates from elementary education, middle/secondary education, and arts education in multiple sections of one course engaged in a series of discussion posts and lesson plans related to creating inclusive general education lessons. Using candidate posts, rubric scores, feedback on lesson plans, and course evaluation ratings, a mixed methods approach was used to understand candidate knowledge, perceptions, and applications of Universal Design for Learning. The results from our research have important implications for policy, practice, and research. Policy makers must be aware of the lack of UDL in general education programs and IHEs need to do more than the cursory coverage of these principles. Additional research is needed for the implementation of lessons designed using UDL by general education candidates.

Trends in Higher EducationVol. 3(4)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Disability Education and Employment
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Mixed Methods Analysis of General Education Candidates’ Knowledge, Perceptions, and Application of Universal Design for Learning — Cindy M. Gilson, Holly Johnson, et al. · Trends in Higher Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS