Eligibility rate of applicant’s LinkedIn account: a naïve bayes classification and visualization

In the digital era, social media platforms like LinkedIn have become famous for recruitment, and recruiters widely use them to find potential employees. The recruitment process is crucial in organizations, as it involves selecting qualified applicants from a diverse pool. However, the screening process and manual recruitment process entail significant time, high costs, and potential bias. Consequently, it may cause recruiting unqualified applicants and may affect the organizations. Thus, this study aims to classify and generate a list of potential job applicants by analyzing seven attributes of their LinkedIn accounts: title, location, skills, education, language, certification, and years of experience. Data are collected from LinkedIn profiles and then undergo data pre-processing. The naive Bayes (NB) algorithm is implemented as the classification algorithm and sets the classification as “eligible” or “ineligible”. The NB model achieved an accuracy testing of 89.8%, indicating good performance in classifying potential job applicants. At the same time, we measure the similarity cosine score to set the mean of the eligibility. The classification results are visualized for the suitable applicants in descending rank, allowing users to choose the applicants’ classification status efficiently. For the system usability, we managed to get 90% from the recruitment expert.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v13.i4.pp4334-4343
Primary Topic
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eligibility rate of applicant’s LinkedIn account: a naïve bayes classification and visualization

Lala Septem Riza, Khyrina Airin Fariza Abu Samah, Anis Amilah Shari, Nurul Athirah Ahmad et al.
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
article

Eligibility rate of applicant’s LinkedIn account: a naïve bayes classification and visualization

Lala Septem Riza, Khyrina Airin Fariza Abu Samah, Anis Amilah Shari, Nurul Athirah Ahmad, Amir Haikal Abdul Halim, Hana Fakhira Almarzuki, Zuhri Arafah
article en

Abstract

In the digital era, social media platforms like LinkedIn have become famous for recruitment, and recruiters widely use them to find potential employees. The recruitment process is crucial in organizations, as it involves selecting qualified applicants from a diverse pool. However, the screening process and manual recruitment process entail significant time, high costs, and potential bias. Consequently, it may cause recruiting unqualified applicants and may affect the organizations. Thus, this study aims to classify and generate a list of potential job applicants by analyzing seven attributes of their LinkedIn accounts: title, location, skills, education, language, certification, and years of experience. Data are collected from LinkedIn profiles and then undergo data pre-processing. The naive Bayes (NB) algorithm is implemented as the classification algorithm and sets the classification as “eligible” or “ineligible”. The NB model achieved an accuracy testing of 89.8%, indicating good performance in classifying potential job applicants. At the same time, we measure the similarity cosine score to set the mean of the eligibility. The classification results are visualized for the suitable applicants in descending rank, allowing users to choose the applicants’ classification status efficiently. For the system usability, we managed to get 90% from the recruitment expert.

IAES International Journal of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 13(4)
Indonesia University of Education (ID), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Universiti Teknologi MARA
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.