Maintenance of Spatial Distribution by Convict Cichlid Pairs Is Influenced by Parental Defense Behavior toward Conspecific and Heterospecific Parental Pairs

Parental defense of offspring may be risky, so parents should balance costs and benefits, making context-dependent decisions based on the threat to offspring. Our previous field studies on Convict Cichlids, Amatitlania nigrofasciata , showed that the risk of brood mixing impacts aggression toward conspecific intruders. We also previously observed that parental pairs distribute differently in relation to conspecifics versus heterospecific pair locations with brood defense appearing to vary depending on intruder species (i.e., there appeared to be more aggression toward conspecifics than heterospecifics at closer distances). In the current study, we mapped pair distribution and found that more Convict Cichlid pairs had at least one neighboring pair within 3 m than did not. In addition, pairs with neighbors tended to be closer to heterospecific pairs than to conspecific pairs. To explore the relationship between the spatial distribution of pairs and parental defense behavior, we presented pairs of parental Convict Cichlids with stimuli consisting of a conspecific parental pair or a heterospecific parental pair ( Hypsophrys nematopus ). Each focal pair was exposed to each species separately and then simultaneously at both near (20 cm) and far (60 cm) distances. During separate presentations, focal parents were more aggressive at near distances versus far distances for both conspecifics and heterospecifics, though the aggression toward heterospecifics was always less than that toward conspecifics at each distance. In the simultaneous presentations, the focal parents were always more aggressive toward conspecific stimuli. These results support the idea that each species represent separate risks (such as conspecific brood mixing or predation) and benefits (such as shared offspring or territory defense) to reproductive fitness, which help shape the observed natural distribution of pairs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ichthyology & Herpetology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1643/i2023085
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maintenance of Spatial Distribution by Convict Cichlid Pairs Is Influenced by Parental Defense Behavior toward Conspecific and Heterospecific Parental Pairs

Nicholas Santangelo, Natalie April van Breukelen, Morgan Rose Lane
1 citations
Ichthyology & Herpetology
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
0.51
article

Maintenance of Spatial Distribution by Convict Cichlid Pairs Is Influenced by Parental Defense Behavior toward Conspecific and Heterospecific Parental Pairs

Nicholas Santangelo, Natalie April van Breukelen, Morgan Rose Lane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Parental defense of offspring may be risky, so parents should balance costs and benefits, making context-dependent decisions based on the threat to offspring. Our previous field studies on Convict Cichlids, Amatitlania nigrofasciata , showed that the risk of brood mixing impacts aggression toward conspecific intruders. We also previously observed that parental pairs distribute differently in relation to conspecifics versus heterospecific pair locations with brood defense appearing to vary depending on intruder species (i.e., there appeared to be more aggression toward conspecifics than heterospecifics at closer distances). In the current study, we mapped pair distribution and found that more Convict Cichlid pairs had at least one neighboring pair within 3 m than did not. In addition, pairs with neighbors tended to be closer to heterospecific pairs than to conspecific pairs. To explore the relationship between the spatial distribution of pairs and parental defense behavior, we presented pairs of parental Convict Cichlids with stimuli consisting of a conspecific parental pair or a heterospecific parental pair ( Hypsophrys nematopus ). Each focal pair was exposed to each species separately and then simultaneously at both near (20 cm) and far (60 cm) distances. During separate presentations, focal parents were more aggressive at near distances versus far distances for both conspecifics and heterospecifics, though the aggression toward heterospecifics was always less than that toward conspecifics at each distance. In the simultaneous presentations, the focal parents were always more aggressive toward conspecific stimuli. These results support the idea that each species represent separate risks (such as conspecific brood mixing or predation) and benefits (such as shared offspring or territory defense) to reproductive fitness, which help shape the observed natural distribution of pairs.

Ichthyology & HerpetologyVol. 112(3)
Hofstra University (US), Loyola University Maryland (US), Salem Hospital (US), ORCID (US), Goucher College (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.