Odor lateralization test is insensitive to small degrees of intranasal trigeminal activation

Adding a small amount of a trigeminal compound to a selective olfactory odor does not significantly improve lateralization performance. Trigeminal lateralization likely follows an "accumulative" pattern rather than an "all or none" rule. With only 20 trials, the task may lack sensitivity to detect low levels of trigeminal irritation in selective olfactory odors, though it does not rule out trigeminal activation. The odor lateralization task can screen for odors with prominent trigeminal compounds by comparing group-level performance with that of purely olfactory odors. Future studies should use more ideal stimuli (e.g., PEA for olfactory, CO2 for trigeminal) to test the replicability of the results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09016-x
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Odor lateralization test is insensitive to small degrees of intranasal trigeminal activation

Yiling Mai, Thomas R. Hummel, Benjamin Brieke
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
article

Odor lateralization test is insensitive to small degrees of intranasal trigeminal activation

Yiling Mai, Thomas R. Hummel, Benjamin Brieke
article en

Abstract

Adding a small amount of a trigeminal compound to a selective olfactory odor does not significantly improve lateralization performance. Trigeminal lateralization likely follows an "accumulative" pattern rather than an "all or none" rule. With only 20 trials, the task may lack sensitivity to detect low levels of trigeminal irritation in selective olfactory odors, though it does not rule out trigeminal activation. The odor lateralization task can screen for odors with prominent trigeminal compounds by comparing group-level performance with that of purely olfactory odors. Future studies should use more ideal stimuli (e.g., PEA for olfactory, CO2 for trigeminal) to test the replicability of the results.

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-LaryngologyVol. 282(1)
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universität Dresden, Takasago, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Odor lateralization test is insensitive to small degrees of intranasal trigeminal activation — Yiling Mai, Thomas R. Hummel, et al. · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS