Service Lines, Neurology, and Academic Medicine

Service lines are increasingly common for organizing multidisciplinary patient care. Concerns regarding impacts of neuroscience service lines were voiced at several national neurology department chair summits, prompting the American Academy of Neurology to convene a Service Lines Workgroup. Neurology department leaders nationally at institutions that had created or considered a neuroscience service line were interviewed to elicit their experiences and lessons learned. Potential benefits identified stemmed from additional resources that the service line structure yielded (patient navigators, quality improvement staff, technicians) and strengthening of cross-department collaboration. Potential pitfalls included top-down institutional decision-making regarding service line creation, lack of explicit goals, late involvement of neurology, imbalances in neurology representation in leadership, unclear impacts on department finances, and lack of education and research mission integration into service lines. Establishing a satisfactory decision-making structure in a matrixed arrangement and ensuring that funds flow allocations acknowledged neurology's "upstream" contributions were also challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology Clinical Practice
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1212/cpj.0000000000200383
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Service Lines, Neurology, and Academic Medicine

Matthew J. Stowe, Tasha Ostendorf, Barbara G. Vickrey, Clifton L. Gooch et al.
2 citations
Neurology Clinical Practice
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
1.70
article

Service Lines, Neurology, and Academic Medicine

Matthew J. Stowe, Tasha Ostendorf, Barbara G. Vickrey, Clifton L. Gooch, Augustin C. Rubio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Service lines are increasingly common for organizing multidisciplinary patient care. Concerns regarding impacts of neuroscience service lines were voiced at several national neurology department chair summits, prompting the American Academy of Neurology to convene a Service Lines Workgroup. Neurology department leaders nationally at institutions that had created or considered a neuroscience service line were interviewed to elicit their experiences and lessons learned. Potential benefits identified stemmed from additional resources that the service line structure yielded (patient navigators, quality improvement staff, technicians) and strengthening of cross-department collaboration. Potential pitfalls included top-down institutional decision-making regarding service line creation, lack of explicit goals, late involvement of neurology, imbalances in neurology representation in leadership, unclear impacts on department finances, and lack of education and research mission integration into service lines. Establishing a satisfactory decision-making structure in a matrixed arrangement and ensuring that funds flow allocations acknowledged neurology's "upstream" contributions were also challenges.

Neurology Clinical PracticeVol. 15(1)
American Academy of Neurology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Service Lines, Neurology, and Academic Medicine — Matthew J. Stowe, Tasha Ostendorf, et al. · Neurology Clinical Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS