Comparison of MRI Brain and Spine Lesions During Clinical Attacks and Remission in MOG Antibody-associated Disease and Multiple Sclerosis

ObjectiveTo differentiate MRI characteristics of MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) during attacks and remission. Design/MethodsWe retrospectively included Mayo Clinic MOGAD and MS patients that: 1) Fulfilled their respective diagnostic criteria; 2) Had paired MRIs from clinical attacks (<30 days) and remission(≥12 months without interval attacks). MRIs (T1 brain, T2-FLAIR brain, T2 spine, and T1-post-gadolinium brain/spine) were reviewed to identify salient radiographic features. ResultsWe included 43 patients with MOGAD (median age 31[range, 3-67], 63% female, 44% on treatment) and 49 patients with MS (median age 39[range, 17-65], 65% female, 71% on treatment). The frequency of brain MRI features in MOGAD vs MS on MRI exams was as follows: T1 hypointense (attack: 8/44[18%] vs 40/60[66%], p<0.0001; remission: 5/44[11%] vs 40/60 [66%], p<0.0001), T2-periventricular (attack: 12/44[27%] vs 52/60[87%], p<0.0001; remission: 9/44[21%] vs 53/60[88%], p<0.0001), and gadolinium enhancing parenchymal lesions (attack: 12/42[29%] vs 33/58[57%], p<0.008; remission: 0/40[0%] vs 8/58[14%, asymptomatic new lesions], p=0.02). In those with spinal cord T2-lesions, comparing MOGAD to MS revealed: longitudinally-extensive T2-lesions on sagittal imaging (attack: 8/17[47%] vs 1/30[3%], p=0.0006; remission: 2/6[33%] and 0/29[0%], p=0.025) and peripheral T2-lesion location on axial imaging (attack: 8/17[47%] vs 29/30[97%], p=0.0001; remission: 1/6[17%] versus 28/29[97%], p=0.0001). Remission brain and spine MRI exams were more likely to be normal in MOGAD versus MS suggesting increased lesion resolution in MOGAD (brain 14/44[32%] vs 0/60[0%], p<0.001; spine 21/27[78%] vs 7/36[19%], p<0.001). Resolution of 1 or more brain T2-lesions was highly suggestive of MOGAD (sensitivity 95%, specificity 95%, Youden’s index 0.9). ConclusionsMRIs in MOGAD have distinct characteristics from MS during attacks and remission with T2-lesion resolution on follow-up imaging the strongest predictor of MOGAD. Understanding these characteristics may aid clinical diagnosis, guide outcome measures for clinical trials, and improve our understanding of MOGAD pathogenesis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0001051608.35719.31
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of MRI Brain and Spine Lesions During Clinical Attacks and Remission in MOG Antibody-associated Disease and Multiple Sclerosis

Ajay A. Madhavan, Alfonso López, Laura Cacciaguerra, Eoin P. Flanagan et al.
1 citations
Neurology
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
0.42
article

Comparison of MRI Brain and Spine Lesions During Clinical Attacks and Remission in MOG Antibody-associated Disease and Multiple Sclerosis

Ajay A. Madhavan, Alfonso López, Laura Cacciaguerra, Eoin P. Flanagan, Stephanie B. Syc‐Mazurek, Cristina Valencia Sánchez, Deena Tajfirouz, Vyanka Redenbaugh, Karl N. Krecke, John Jing-Wei Chen, Elia Sechi, Sean Joseph Pittock, Jayawant N. Mandrekar, Jan‐Mendelt Tillema
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo differentiate MRI characteristics of MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) during attacks and remission. Design/MethodsWe retrospectively included Mayo Clinic MOGAD and MS patients that: 1) Fulfilled their respective diagnostic criteria; 2) Had paired MRIs from clinical attacks (<30 days) and remission(≥12 months without interval attacks). MRIs (T1 brain, T2-FLAIR brain, T2 spine, and T1-post-gadolinium brain/spine) were reviewed to identify salient radiographic features. ResultsWe included 43 patients with MOGAD (median age 31[range, 3-67], 63% female, 44% on treatment) and 49 patients with MS (median age 39[range, 17-65], 65% female, 71% on treatment). The frequency of brain MRI features in MOGAD vs MS on MRI exams was as follows: T1 hypointense (attack: 8/44[18%] vs 40/60[66%], p<0.0001; remission: 5/44[11%] vs 40/60 [66%], p<0.0001), T2-periventricular (attack: 12/44[27%] vs 52/60[87%], p<0.0001; remission: 9/44[21%] vs 53/60[88%], p<0.0001), and gadolinium enhancing parenchymal lesions (attack: 12/42[29%] vs 33/58[57%], p<0.008; remission: 0/40[0%] vs 8/58[14%, asymptomatic new lesions], p=0.02). In those with spinal cord T2-lesions, comparing MOGAD to MS revealed: longitudinally-extensive T2-lesions on sagittal imaging (attack: 8/17[47%] vs 1/30[3%], p=0.0006; remission: 2/6[33%] and 0/29[0%], p=0.025) and peripheral T2-lesion location on axial imaging (attack: 8/17[47%] vs 29/30[97%], p=0.0001; remission: 1/6[17%] versus 28/29[97%], p=0.0001). Remission brain and spine MRI exams were more likely to be normal in MOGAD versus MS suggesting increased lesion resolution in MOGAD (brain 14/44[32%] vs 0/60[0%], p<0.001; spine 21/27[78%] vs 7/36[19%], p<0.001). Resolution of 1 or more brain T2-lesions was highly suggestive of MOGAD (sensitivity 95%, specificity 95%, Youden’s index 0.9). ConclusionsMRIs in MOGAD have distinct characteristics from MS during attacks and remission with T2-lesion resolution on follow-up imaging the strongest predictor of MOGAD. Understanding these characteristics may aid clinical diagnosis, guide outcome measures for clinical trials, and improve our understanding of MOGAD pathogenesis.

NeurologyVol. 103(7_Supplement_1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.