Patient Preferences for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment Profiles: Results of a Web-based Survey

ObjectiveTo better understand treatment preferences of patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) and to estimate the relative importance of preferred treatment attributes. BackgroundgMG is a rare, chronic autoimmune disorder. Key therapeutic approaches differ among the available treatments for AChR-Ab+ gMG, but no studies on patient treatment preferences have been published to date. Design/MethodsUS adults with a self-reported physician diagnosis of AChR-Ab+ gMG completed a web-based survey. Two object-case, best-worst scaling (BWS) exercises were analyzed. The first BWS exercise obtained preferences for a treatment profile similar to ravulizumab compared with 4 other treatment profiles (eg, similar to eculizumab, efgartigimod intravenous and subcutaneous, and zilucoplan). The second BWS exercise obtained preferences for the individual attributes used to define the treatment profiles. Profile scenarios were defined by mode of administration and dosing frequency only, followed by the addition of consistent disease control and meningococcal vaccination requirements. Additionally, the most important gMG treatment attribute was identified. ResultsOf 153 respondents, mean age was 49 years, 77% female, 84% white, 54% with college degree or higher, 41% employed, and 27% had been diagnosed for <3 years. Mean MG-Activities of Daily Living score was 8.0 (min–max: 0–17). Respondents preferred the ravulizumab-like profile vs all 3 other profile-based scenarios: 35% vs 10%–22% when considering mode and dosing frequency only, 44% vs 3%–31% when considering addition of consistent disease control, and 39% vs 5%–29% when considering all 4 attributes. Consistent disease control was selected as the most important attribute when choosing a gMG treatment (82%), followed by mode of administration (10%), dosing frequency (6%), and meningococcal vaccination requirements (3%). ConclusionsPatients with gMG preferred treatments with less frequent dosing schedules and consistent disease control, and consistent disease control was considered the most important attribute when choosing a therapy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0001051448.28270.45
Primary Topic
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Preferences for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment Profiles: Results of a Web-based Survey

Christine Poulos, Cooper Bussberg, Karen W L Yee, Kelley Myers
Neurology
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
article

Patient Preferences for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment Profiles: Results of a Web-based Survey

Christine Poulos, Cooper Bussberg, Karen W L Yee, Kelley Myers
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo better understand treatment preferences of patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) and to estimate the relative importance of preferred treatment attributes. BackgroundgMG is a rare, chronic autoimmune disorder. Key therapeutic approaches differ among the available treatments for AChR-Ab+ gMG, but no studies on patient treatment preferences have been published to date. Design/MethodsUS adults with a self-reported physician diagnosis of AChR-Ab+ gMG completed a web-based survey. Two object-case, best-worst scaling (BWS) exercises were analyzed. The first BWS exercise obtained preferences for a treatment profile similar to ravulizumab compared with 4 other treatment profiles (eg, similar to eculizumab, efgartigimod intravenous and subcutaneous, and zilucoplan). The second BWS exercise obtained preferences for the individual attributes used to define the treatment profiles. Profile scenarios were defined by mode of administration and dosing frequency only, followed by the addition of consistent disease control and meningococcal vaccination requirements. Additionally, the most important gMG treatment attribute was identified. ResultsOf 153 respondents, mean age was 49 years, 77% female, 84% white, 54% with college degree or higher, 41% employed, and 27% had been diagnosed for <3 years. Mean MG-Activities of Daily Living score was 8.0 (min–max: 0–17). Respondents preferred the ravulizumab-like profile vs all 3 other profile-based scenarios: 35% vs 10%–22% when considering mode and dosing frequency only, 44% vs 3%–31% when considering addition of consistent disease control, and 39% vs 5%–29% when considering all 4 attributes. Consistent disease control was selected as the most important attribute when choosing a gMG treatment (82%), followed by mode of administration (10%), dosing frequency (6%), and meningococcal vaccination requirements (3%). ConclusionsPatients with gMG preferred treatments with less frequent dosing schedules and consistent disease control, and consistent disease control was considered the most important attribute when choosing a therapy.

NeurologyVol. 103(7_Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.