Strengthening crisis resilience in German primary care by using quality indicators: findings of a process evaluation in the RESILARE project

A total of n = 32 indicators covered four domains: (1) individual resilience, (2) crisis prevention, (3) organizational resilience, and (4) climate resilience. N = 34 practices participated in the piloting and the process evaluation. Participants generally attributed a high relevance to the domains, and considered the indicator set suitable for implementation into existing quality management systems. Planning and implementation of measures that strengthen crisis resilience in practices were triggered or intensified by piloting the indicators and by the two-part feedback report. The identified challenges involved the volume of indicators and practice-individual implementation of renewable energy sources on rented premises. Participants expressed their desire for peer exchange regarding proven concepts for crisis resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Public Health
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01400-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengthening crisis resilience in German primary care by using quality indicators: findings of a process evaluation in the RESILARE project

Regina Poß-Doering, Jan Koetsenruijter, Nicola Litke, Joachim Szécsényi et al.
1 citations
Archives of Public Health
Climate Change and Health Impacts
0.31
article

Strengthening crisis resilience in German primary care by using quality indicators: findings of a process evaluation in the RESILARE project

Regina Poß-Doering, Jan Koetsenruijter, Nicola Litke, Joachim Szécsényi, Aline Weis, Martina Köppen, Stephanie Kümmel, Michel Wensing
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A total of n = 32 indicators covered four domains: (1) individual resilience, (2) crisis prevention, (3) organizational resilience, and (4) climate resilience. N = 34 practices participated in the piloting and the process evaluation. Participants generally attributed a high relevance to the domains, and considered the indicator set suitable for implementation into existing quality management systems. Planning and implementation of measures that strengthen crisis resilience in practices were triggered or intensified by piloting the indicators and by the two-part feedback report. The identified challenges involved the volume of indicators and practice-individual implementation of renewable energy sources on rented premises. Participants expressed their desire for peer exchange regarding proven concepts for crisis resilience.

Archives of Public HealthVol. 82(1)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
0.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strengthening crisis resilience in German primary care by using quality indicators: findings of a process evaluation in the RESILARE project — Regina Poß-Doering, Jan Koetsenruijter, et al. · Archives of Public Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS