Discerning the impact of ctDNA detection on patient decision-making in early-stage breast cancer

The impact of knowledge of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status on patient decisions in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) weighing benefit and toxicity is unknown. Here, 286 women with a history of non-metastatic breast cancer who had received chemotherapy completed a survey mimicking scenarios of residual TNBC after chemotherapy and unknown, negative, or positive ctDNA status to determine the shift in the decision to receive adjuvant therapy. Participants were then presented scenarios mimicking possible post-neoadjuvant therapies and rated acceptability. A general linear model with repeated measures determined contributions of risk reduction and toxicity. When the hypothetical risk of recurrence mimicked ctDNA negativity, significantly less participants were accepting of adjuvant capecitabine versus no therapy. When presented with ctDNA positivity and increased recurrence risk, the degree of benefit impacted acceptability more than the toxicity profile. As genomic technology advances and ctDNA assays become commercially available, it is imperative to understand the impact on patient decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Breast Cancer
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00701-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discerning the impact of ctDNA detection on patient decision-making in early-stage breast cancer

Bryan P. Schneider, Elda Railey, Gregory D. Zimet, Tarah J. Ballinger et al.
1 citations
npj Breast Cancer
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.29
article

Discerning the impact of ctDNA detection on patient decision-making in early-stage breast cancer

Bryan P. Schneider, Elda Railey, Gregory D. Zimet, Tarah J. Ballinger, Mary Lou Smith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The impact of knowledge of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status on patient decisions in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) weighing benefit and toxicity is unknown. Here, 286 women with a history of non-metastatic breast cancer who had received chemotherapy completed a survey mimicking scenarios of residual TNBC after chemotherapy and unknown, negative, or positive ctDNA status to determine the shift in the decision to receive adjuvant therapy. Participants were then presented scenarios mimicking possible post-neoadjuvant therapies and rated acceptability. A general linear model with repeated measures determined contributions of risk reduction and toxicity. When the hypothetical risk of recurrence mimicked ctDNA negativity, significantly less participants were accepting of adjuvant capecitabine versus no therapy. When presented with ctDNA positivity and increased recurrence risk, the degree of benefit impacted acceptability more than the toxicity profile. As genomic technology advances and ctDNA assays become commercially available, it is imperative to understand the impact on patient decision-making.

npj Breast CancerVol. 10(1)
Research Advocacy Network (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
American College of Radiology Imaging Network, ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.